Suppr超能文献

牙槽嵴劈开术对种植体疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析。

The efficacy of alveolar ridge split on implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China School of Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.

Department of Prosthodontics, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, No. 14, Section 3, Renmin Nanlu, Chengdu, 610041, China.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 20;23(1):894. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03643-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of the alveolar ridge split (ARS) technique on gained horizontal width of the alveolar ridge and implant survival rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic searching was performed in six electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and SIGLE) from January 1, 2010, to November 1, 2023. Two authors performed study selection, data extraction, and study qualities (ROBINS-I and RoB 2.0) independently. Meta-analysis was performed by Comprehensive meta-analysis 3.0.

RESULTS

24 included studies were observational, and 1 study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT). 14 studies investigated the gained width of the horizontal alveolar ridge, and 17 examined the implants' survival rate. For assessment of risk of bias, nine studies were high risk of bias and 16 studies were moderate risk of bias. Meta-analysis demonstrated that the pooled gained alveolar ridge width was 3.348 mm (95%CI: 4.163 mm, 2.533 mm), and the implant survival rate was 98.1% (95%CI: 98.9%, 96.9%). Seven studies showed seven different complications including exposure, infection, bad split, dehiscence, fracture, paresthesia and soft tissue retraction.

CONCLUSION

Recent ARS technique seems to be an effective method of bone augmentation with enough gained width and a high implant survival rate. Further long-term and RCTs research remains needed to enhance the study quality.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The ARS technique could generate sufficient bone volume, and implants had a high-level survival rate. Therefore, ARS has been proposed to be a reliable horizontal bone augmentation technique that creates good conditions for the implantation of narrow alveolar crests.

摘要

目的

评估牙槽嵴劈开(ARS)技术对获得牙槽嵴水平宽度和种植体存活率的影响。

材料与方法

从 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 11 月 1 日,在六个电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库、Web of Science、中国知网和 SIGLE)中进行电子检索。两名作者独立进行研究选择、数据提取和研究质量评估(ROBINS-I 和 RoB 2.0)。采用综合荟萃分析 3.0 进行荟萃分析。

结果

24 项纳入研究为观察性研究,1 项研究为随机对照试验(RCT)。14 项研究评估了水平牙槽嵴的获得宽度,17 项研究评估了种植体的存活率。在评估偏倚风险方面,9 项研究为高偏倚风险,16 项研究为中偏倚风险。荟萃分析表明,合并后的牙槽嵴获得宽度为 3.348mm(95%CI:4.163mm,2.533mm),种植体存活率为 98.1%(95%CI:98.9%,96.9%)。7 项研究显示了 7 种不同的并发症,包括暴露、感染、不良劈开、裂开、骨折、感觉异常和软组织退缩。

结论

最近的 ARS 技术似乎是一种有效的骨增量方法,具有足够的获得宽度和高种植体存活率。需要进一步进行长期和 RCT 研究,以提高研究质量。

临床相关性

ARS 技术可产生足够的骨量,种植体存活率高。因此,ARS 技术已被提出作为一种可靠的水平骨增量技术,为植入狭窄的牙槽嵴创造了良好的条件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ad3/10662563/13e9aceb08c0/12903_2023_3643_Fig3_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验