• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续静脉滴注拉贝洛尔控制神经外科患者血压的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of continuous intravenous labetalol for blood pressure control in neurosurgical patients.

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Thammasat University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2023 Nov;51(11):3000605231212316. doi: 10.1177/03000605231212316.

DOI:10.1177/03000605231212316
PMID:37987639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10664443/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Current evidence supporting the use of continuous intravenous labetalol for blood pressure (BP) control in neurosurgical patients is limited. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of labetalol in neurosurgical patients and identify potential contributing factors to these outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of neurosurgical patients who received continuous labetalol infusion for BP control. Efficacy was assessed based on the time needed to achieve the target BP (systolic BP ≤ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≤ 90 mmHg). Safety was assessed according to adverse events that occurred during labetalol administration. Factors associated with efficacy and safety were analyzed using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Among 79 patients enrolled in this study, 47 (59.49%) achieved the target BP within 1 hour (early response). No factors were significantly associated with an early response. Hypotension was observed in 11 patients (13.9%), and bradycardia was observed in 8 patients (10.1%). Hypotension was significantly associated with patient age and motor impairment, while bradycardia was significantly associated with diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety profiles of labetalol infusion suggest this treatment as a promising option for BP control in neurosurgical patients.

摘要

目的

目前支持在神经外科患者中使用持续静脉滴注拉贝洛尔控制血压(BP)的证据有限。本研究旨在评估拉贝洛尔在神经外科患者中的疗效和安全性,并确定这些结果的潜在影响因素。

方法

我们回顾性分析了接受持续拉贝洛尔输注以控制血压的神经外科患者的病历。根据达到目标血压(收缩压≤140mmHg 或舒张压≤90mmHg)所需的时间来评估疗效。根据拉贝洛尔给药期间发生的不良事件评估安全性。使用逻辑回归模型分析与疗效和安全性相关的因素。

结果

在这项研究中,共纳入了 79 名患者,其中 47 名(59.49%)在 1 小时内达到目标血压(早期反应)。没有任何因素与早期反应显著相关。11 名患者(13.9%)出现低血压,8 名患者(10.1%)出现心动过缓。低血压与患者年龄和运动障碍显著相关,而心动过缓与糖尿病显著相关。

结论

拉贝洛尔输注的疗效和安全性特征表明,这种治疗方法是神经外科患者控制血压的一种有前途的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fad5/10664443/64d26a3629a1/10.1177_03000605231212316-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fad5/10664443/a5a756de7eaa/10.1177_03000605231212316-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fad5/10664443/64d26a3629a1/10.1177_03000605231212316-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fad5/10664443/a5a756de7eaa/10.1177_03000605231212316-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fad5/10664443/64d26a3629a1/10.1177_03000605231212316-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of continuous intravenous labetalol for blood pressure control in neurosurgical patients.连续静脉滴注拉贝洛尔控制神经外科患者血压的安全性和有效性。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Nov;51(11):3000605231212316. doi: 10.1177/03000605231212316.
2
Safety of high-dose intravenous labetalol in hypertensive crisis.大剂量静脉注射拉贝洛尔治疗高血压危象的安全性
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Feb 9;76(5):286-292. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxy045.
3
Blood Pressure Control in Acute Stroke: Labetalol or Nicardipine?急性脑卒中血压控制:拉贝洛尔还是尼卡地平?
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Sep;30(9):105959. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105959. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
4
Intravenous labetalol compared with intravenous nicardipine in the management of hypertension in critically ill patients.静脉注射拉贝洛尔与尼卡地平治疗危重症患者高血压的比较。
J Crit Care. 2012 Oct;27(5):528.e7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
5
Continuous-Infusion Labetalol vs Nicardipine for Hypertension Management in Stroke Patients.持续输注拉贝洛尔与尼卡地平用于卒中患者高血压管理的比较
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Feb;27(2):460-465. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.09.023. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
6
Controlling hypertension and hypotension immediately post stroke (CHHIPS)--a randomised controlled trial.卒中后立即控制高血压和低血压(CHHIPS)——一项随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Jan;13(9):iii, ix-xi, 1-73. doi: 10.3310/hta13090.
7
Intravenous labetalol for the treatment of hypertension after carotid endarterectomy.
J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1989 Aug;3(4):411-7. doi: 10.1016/s0888-6296(89)97363-8.
8
Case report: profound hypotension associated with labetalol therapy in a patient with cerebral aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage.病例报告:一名患有脑动脉瘤和蛛网膜下腔出血的患者在接受拉贝洛尔治疗时出现严重低血压。
Can J Anaesth. 2006 Jul;53(7):678-83. doi: 10.1007/BF03021626.
9
Comparing Intravenous Labetalol and Intravenous Hydralazine for Managing Severe Gestational Hypertension.比较静脉注射拉贝洛尔和静脉注射肼屈嗪治疗重度妊娠高血压的效果。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 23;15(7):e42332. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42332. eCollection 2023 Jul.
10
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of dual alpha and beta blockers for primary hypertension.双重α和β受体阻滞剂对原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 26;2015(8):CD007449. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007449.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.2022年自发性脑出血患者管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国中风协会指南
Stroke. 2022 Jul;53(7):e282-e361. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000407. Epub 2022 May 17.
2
Perioperative Hypertension Etiologies in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery in University Health Network Hospitals-Canada from 2015-2020.2015年至2020年加拿大大学健康网络医院非心脏手术患者围手术期高血压病因
Integr Blood Press Control. 2022 Mar 19;15:23-32. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S347395. eCollection 2022.
3
The burden of perioperative hypertension/hypotension: A systematic review.
围手术期高血压/低血压负担:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0263737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263737. eCollection 2022.
4
Blood Pressure Control in Acute Stroke: Labetalol or Nicardipine?急性脑卒中血压控制:拉贝洛尔还是尼卡地平?
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Sep;30(9):105959. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105959. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
5
Elevated blood pressure after craniotomy: A prospective observational study.开颅术后血压升高:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Crit Care. 2020 Dec;60:235-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.08.013. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
Tight Control of Systolic Blood Pressure in Spontaneous Intraparenchymal Brain Hemorrhage.自发性脑实质内出血患者收缩压的严格控制
Cureus. 2019 Jul 23;11(7):e5215. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5215.
7
Safety of high-dose intravenous labetalol in hypertensive crisis.大剂量静脉注射拉贝洛尔治疗高血压危象的安全性
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Feb 9;76(5):286-292. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxy045.
8
Blood Pressure Targets in Perioperative Care.围手术期护理中的血压目标
Hypertension. 2018 Oct;72(4):806-817. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11688.
9
Blood pressure reduction in hypertensive acute ischemic stroke patients does not affect cerebral blood flow.高血压性急性缺血性脑卒中患者的血压降低不会影响脑血流。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019 Sep;39(9):1878-1887. doi: 10.1177/0271678X18774708. Epub 2018 May 8.
10
Comparing the Effect of Labetalol versus Morphine on Controlling Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate during Emergence from Anesthesia after Craniotomy.比较拉贝洛尔与吗啡对开颅术后麻醉苏醒期血压和脉搏率的控制效果。
Adv Biomed Res. 2017 Oct 16;6:127. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.216781. eCollection 2017.