• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期急性护理医院关闭后患者的结局。

Patient Outcomes After Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Closures.

机构信息

The Pulmonary Center, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Richard A and Susan F Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2344377. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44377.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44377
PMID:37988077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10663966/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Long-term acute care hospitals (LTCHs) are common sites of postacute care for patients recovering from severe respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (MV). However, federal payment reform led to the closure of many LTCHs in the US, and it is unclear how closure of LTCHs may have affected upstream care patterns at short-stay hospitals and overall patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the association between LTCH closures and short-stay hospital care patterns and patient outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective, national, matched cohort study used difference-in-differences analysis to compare outcomes at short-stay hospitals reliant on LTCHs that closed during 2012 to 2018 with outcomes at control hospitals. Data were obtained from the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review File, 2011 to 2019. Participants included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 66 years and older receiving MV for at least 96 hours in an intensive care unit (ie, patients at-risk for prolonged MV) and the subgroup also receiving a tracheostomy (ie, receiving prolonged MV). Data were analyzed from October 2022 to June 2023.

EXPOSURE

Admission to closure-affected hospitals, defined as those discharging at least 60% of patients receiving a tracheostomy to LTCHs that subsequently closed, vs control hospitals.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Upstream hospital care pattern outcomes were short-stay hospital do-not-resuscitate orders, palliative care delivery, tracheostomy placement, and discharge disposition. Patient outcomes included hospital length of stay, days alive and institution free within 90 days, spending per days alive within 90 days, and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2019, 99 454 patients receiving MV for at least 96 hours at 1261 hospitals were discharged to 459 LTCHs; 84 LTCHs closed. Difference-in-differences analysis included 8404 patients (mean age, 76.2 [7.2] years; 4419 [52.6%] men) admitted to 45 closure-affected hospitals and 45 matched-control hospitals. LTCH closure was associated with decreased LTCH transfer rates (difference, -5.1 [95% CI -8.2 to -2.0] percentage points) and decreased spending-per-days-alive (difference, -$8701.58 [95% CI, -$13 323.56 to -$4079.60]). In the subgroup of patients receiving a tracheostomy, there was additionally an increase in do-not-resuscitate rates (difference, 10.3 [95% CI, 4.2 to 16.3] percentage points) and transfer to skilled nursing facilities (difference, 10.0 [95% CI, 4.2 to 15.8] percentage points). There was no significant association of closure with 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, LTCH closure was associated with changes in discharge patterns in patients receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 96 hours and advanced directive decisions in the subgroup receiving a tracheostomy, without change in mortality. Further studies are needed to understand how LTCH availability may be associated with other important outcomes, including functional outcomes and patient and family satisfaction.

摘要

重要性:长期急性护理医院(LTCH)是因严重呼吸衰竭而需要机械通气(MV)康复的患者进行急性后护理的常见场所。然而,联邦支付改革导致美国许多 LTCH 关闭,目前尚不清楚 LTCH 的关闭可能如何影响短期住院医院的上游护理模式和整体患者结局。

目的:评估 LTCH 关闭与短期住院医院护理模式和患者结局之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性、全国性、匹配队列研究使用差异中的差异分析比较了在 2012 年至 2018 年期间关闭的依赖 LTCH 的短期住院医院与对照医院的结局。数据来自医疗保险提供者分析和审查文件,时间范围为 2011 年至 2019 年。参与者包括年龄在 66 岁及以上、在重症监护病房(即有延长 MV 风险的患者)接受 MV 至少 96 小时且亚组患者还接受了气管切开术(即接受延长 MV 的患者)的 Medicare 收费服务受益人。数据分析于 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 6 月进行。

暴露:入住受关闭影响的医院,定义为至少有 60%接受气管切开术的患者出院至随后关闭的 LTCH 的医院,与对照医院相比。

主要结局和测量:上游医院护理模式结局包括短期住院医院不复苏医嘱、提供姑息治疗、气管切开术安置和出院处置。患者结局包括住院时间、90 天内存活且无机构的天数、90 天内存活每天的支出以及 90 天死亡率。

结果:在 2011 年至 2019 年期间,1261 家医院的 99454 名接受 MV 至少 96 小时的患者出院至 459 家 LTCH;84 家 LTCH 关闭。差异中的差异分析包括 8404 名患者(平均年龄,76.2[7.2]岁;4419[52.6%]名男性)入住 45 家受关闭影响的医院和 45 家匹配的对照医院。LTCH 关闭与 LTCH 转院率降低(差异,-5.1[95%CI-8.2 至-2.0]个百分点)和每天存活支出减少(差异,-8701.58 美元[95%CI,-13323.56 美元至-4079.60 美元])相关。在接受气管切开术的亚组患者中,还观察到不复苏率增加(差异,10.3[95%CI,4.2 至 16.3]个百分点)和转至康复护理设施(差异,10.0[95%CI,4.2 至 15.8]个百分点)。关闭与 90 天死亡率之间无显著关联。

结论和相关性:在这项队列研究中,LTCH 关闭与接受至少 96 小时 MV 的患者出院模式变化以及接受气管切开术的亚组患者高级指导决策相关,而死亡率没有变化。需要进一步研究以了解 LTCH 的可用性如何与其他重要结局相关,包括功能结局和患者和家庭满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c39/10663966/fda4a759b5a7/jamanetwopen-e2344377-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c39/10663966/d029e1593a0d/jamanetwopen-e2344377-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c39/10663966/64370d009e5b/jamanetwopen-e2344377-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c39/10663966/fda4a759b5a7/jamanetwopen-e2344377-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c39/10663966/d029e1593a0d/jamanetwopen-e2344377-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c39/10663966/64370d009e5b/jamanetwopen-e2344377-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c39/10663966/fda4a759b5a7/jamanetwopen-e2344377-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient Outcomes After Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Closures.长期急性护理医院关闭后患者的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2344377. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44377.
2
Survival, Function, and Cognition After Hospitalization in Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals.长期急性护理医院住院后的生存、功能和认知。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413309. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13309.
3
In-Hospital vs 30-Day Sepsis Mortality at US Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals.美国安全网和非安全网医院的住院与 30 天败血症死亡率比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412873. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12873.
4
Patient Outcomes After Hospital Discharge to Home With Home Health Care vs to a Skilled Nursing Facility.患者出院后居家接受家庭保健护理与入住专业护理机构的结局比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 1;179(5):617-623. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7998.
5
Comparing post-acute rehabilitation use, length of stay, and outcomes experienced by Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with hip fracture in the United States: A secondary analysis of administrative data.比较美国 Medicare 按服务收费和 Medicare Advantage 受益人与髋部骨折相关的康复使用、住院时间和康复结局:基于行政数据的二次分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 26;15(6):e1002592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002592. eCollection 2018 Jun.
6
Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment system for acute care hospitals and fiscal year 2010 rates; and changes to the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and rate years 2010 and 2009 rates. Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;急性护理医院住院病人前瞻性支付系统的变更及2010财年费率;以及长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统的变更及2010年和2009年费率。最终规则及有意见征求期的暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2009 Aug 27;74(165):43753-4236.
7
Assessment of Rural-Urban Differences in Postacute Care Utilization and Outcomes Among Older US Adults.评估美国老年人在康复期护理的城乡利用差异和结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918738. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18738.
8
Post-ICU mechanical ventilation at 23 long-term care hospitals: a multicenter outcomes study.23家长期护理医院的重症监护病房后机械通气:一项多中心结局研究。
Chest. 2007 Jan;131(1):85-93. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-1081.
9
Changes in Postacute Care in the Medicare Shared Savings Program.医疗保险共同节约计划中急性后期护理的变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Apr 1;177(4):518-526. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9115.
10
Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2017 Rates; Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers; Graduate Medical Education; Hospital Notification Procedures Applicable to Beneficiaries Receiving Observation Services; Technical Changes Relating to Costs to Organizations and Medicare Cost Reports; Finalization of Interim Final Rules With Comment Period on LTCH PPS Payments for Severe Wounds, Modifications of Limitations on Redesignation by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board, and Extensions of Payments to MDHs and Low-Volume Hospitals. Final rule.医疗保险计划;急性护理医院的住院病人前瞻性支付系统以及长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统和政策变更与2017财年费率;特定提供者的质量报告要求;毕业后医学教育;适用于接受观察服务受益人的医院通知程序;与组织成本和医疗保险成本报告相关的技术变更;关于严重伤口长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统支付的暂行最终规则征求意见稿的最终确定、医疗保险地理分类审查委员会重新指定限制的修改以及向临界接入医院和低容量医院的支付延期。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Aug 22;81(162):56761-7345.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival, Function, and Cognition After Hospitalization in Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals.长期急性护理医院住院后的生存、功能和认知。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413309. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13309.

本文引用的文献

1
Decline in Prolonged Acute Mechanical Ventilation, 2011-2019.2011 - 2019年长期急性机械通气的下降情况
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 1;206(5):640-644. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202203-0473LE.
2
Predictive Validity of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score versus Claims-based Scores among Critically Ill Patients.序贯器官衰竭评估评分与基于索赔的评分在危重症患者中的预测效度
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Jun;19(6):1072-1076. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1251RL.
3
Establishing Medicaid incentives for liberating nursing home patients from ventilators.
为让养老院患者摆脱呼吸机,建立医疗补助激励机制。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jan;70(1):259-268. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17513. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
4
Days out of Institution after Tracheostomy and Gastrostomy Placement in Critically Ill Older Adults.气管切开和胃造口术后危重症老年人的离院天数。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Mar;19(3):424-432. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202106-649OC.
5
Association of Proximity to a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital With Hospital Tracheostomy Practices.长期急性护理医院临近程度与医院气管切开术实践的关联。
Crit Care Med. 2022 Jan 1;50(1):93-102. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005146.
6
Comparative effectiveness of long-term acute care hospital versus skilled nursing facility transfer.长期急性病医院与专业护理机构转诊的比较效果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 11;20(1):1032. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05847-6.
7
Use of Hydrocortisone, Ascorbic Acid, and Thiamine in Adults with Septic Shock.氢化可的松、抗坏血酸和硫胺素在成人脓毒性休克中的应用。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec 1;202(11):1531-1539. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202005-1829OC.
8
Effective Care Practices in Patients Receiving Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation. An Ethnographic Study.接受长时间机械通气患者的有效护理实践。一项民族志研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 1;201(7):823-831. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201910-2006OC.
9
Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Use of Non-Mechanically Ventilated Hospitalized Older Adults.长期急性护理医院中老年非机械通气住院患者的使用情况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Nov;66(11):2112-2119. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15564. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
10
Effect of Site-Neutral Payment Policy on Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Use.地点中性支付政策对长期急性护理医院使用的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Nov;66(11):2104-2111. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15539. Epub 2018 Oct 3.