Exercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Navarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN)-Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023 Dec;14(6):2959-2968. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13375. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
Bed rest during hospitalization can negatively impact functional independence and clinical status of older individuals. Strategies focused on maintaining and improving muscle function may help reverse these losses. This study investigated the effects of a short-term multicomponent exercise intervention on maximal strength and muscle power in hospitalized older patients.
This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial was conducted in an acute care unit in a tertiary public hospital. Ninety (39 women) older patients (mean age 87.7 ± 4.8 years) undergoing acute-care hospitalization [median (IQR) duration 8 (1.75) and 8 (3) days for intervention and control groups, respectively]) were randomly assigned to an exercise intervention group (n = 44) or a control group (n = 46). The control group received standard care hospital including physical rehabilitation as needed. The multicomponent exercise intervention was performed for 3 consecutive days during the hospitalization, consisting of individualized power training, balance, and walking exercises. Outcomes assessed at baseline and discharge were maximal strength through 1 repetition maximum test (1RM) in the leg press and bench press exercises, and muscle power output at different loads (≤30% of 1RM and between 45% and 55% of 1RM) in the leg press exercise. Mean peak power during 10 repetitions was assessed at loads between 45% and 55% of 1RM.
At discharge, intervention group increased 19.2 kg (Mean Δ% = 40.4%) in leg press 1RM [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.1, 26.2 kg; P < 0.001] and 2.9 kg (Mean Δ% = 19.7%) in bench press 1RM (95% CI: 0.6, 5.2 kg; P < 0.001). The intervention group also increased peak power by 18.8 W (Mean Δ% = 69.2%) (95% CI: 8.4, 29.1 W; P < 0.001) and mean propulsive power by 9.3 (Mean Δ% = 26.8%) W (95% CI: 2.5, 16.1 W; P = 0.002) at loads ≤30% of 1RM. The intervention group also increased peak power by 39.1 W (Mean Δ% = 60.0%) (95% CI: 19.2, 59.0 W; P < 0.001) and mean propulsive power by 22.9 W (Mean Δ% = 64.1%) (95% CI: 11.7, 34.1 W; P < 0.001) at loads between 45% and 55% of 1RM. Mean peak power during the 10 repetitions improved by 20.8 W (Mean Δ% = 36.4%) (95% CI: 3.0, 38.6 W; P = 0.011). No significant changes were observed in the control group for any endpoint.
An individualized multicomponent exercise program including progressive power training performed over 3 days markedly improved muscle strength and power in acutely hospitalized older patients.
住院期间卧床休息会对老年人的功能独立性和临床状况产生负面影响。专注于维持和改善肌肉功能的策略可能有助于逆转这些损失。本研究调查了短期多组分运动干预对住院老年患者最大力量和肌肉力量的影响。
这是一项随机临床试验的二次分析,在一家三级公立医院的急性护理病房进行。90 名(39 名女性)老年患者(平均年龄 87.7±4.8 岁)接受急性住院治疗[干预组和对照组的中位数(IQR)持续时间分别为 8(1.75)和 8(3)天])被随机分配到运动干预组(n=44)或对照组(n=46)。对照组接受包括物理康复在内的标准医院护理。多组分运动干预在住院期间连续进行 3 天,包括个体化的力量训练、平衡和步行运动。在基线和出院时评估的结果是腿部按压和卧推运动中的 1 次重复最大测试(1RM)的最大力量,以及腿部按压运动中不同负荷(≤30%的 1RM 和 45%至 55%的 1RM)的肌肉功率输出。在 45%至 55%的 1RM 负荷下评估 10 次重复的平均峰值功率。
出院时,干预组腿部按压 1RM 增加了 19.2 公斤(Mean Δ%=40.4%)[95%置信区间(CI):12.1,26.2 公斤;P<0.001]和卧推 1RM 增加了 2.9 公斤(Mean Δ%=19.7%)(95%CI:0.6,5.2 公斤;P<0.001)。干预组在≤30%的 1RM 负荷下的峰值功率也增加了 18.8 W(Mean Δ%=69.2%)(95%CI:8.4,29.1 W;P<0.001)和平均推进功率增加了 9.3 W(Mean Δ%=26.8%)W(95%CI:2.5,16.1 W;P=0.002)。干预组在 45%至 55%的 1RM 负荷下的峰值功率也增加了 39.1 W(Mean Δ%=60.0%)(95%CI:19.2,59.0 W;P<0.001)和平均推进功率增加了 22.9 W(Mean Δ%=64.1%)W(95%CI:11.7,34.1 W;P<0.001)。在 10 次重复中的平均峰值功率提高了 20.8 W(Mean Δ%=36.4%)(95%CI:3.0,38.6 W;P=0.011)。对照组在任何终点都没有观察到显著变化。
包括渐进式力量训练在内的个体化多组分运动方案在住院的老年患者中显著提高了肌肉力量和力量。