Mittermayer H, Rotter M, Riezinger F, Thiel W, Stanek G
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1986 Nov;262(4):500-11.
The susceptibility of 197 strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group (109 B. fragilis, 27 B. thetaiotamicron, 23 B. vulgatus, 1 B. distasonis, 11 B. ovatus and others) to penicillin G, cefoxitin, latamoxef, piperacillin, mezlocillin, clindamycin, metronidazole, tetracycline, doxycycline and chloramphenicol was tested by an agar dilution method. 4 microbiological laboratories in Austria participated in this investigation. In all laboratories the same method was used and a joint quality control carried out. The most active substances were metronidazole and clindamycin (MIC50 1.0 and 0.5 respectively; MIC90 4 mg/l for both). Tetracycline showed only little activity, whereas doxycycline inhibited a major portion of the strains at therapeutically relevant concentrations (MIC50 16 and 2 mg/l, MIC90 32 and 16 mg/l, respectively). The MIC90 of chloramphenicol was 8 mg/l. Piperacillin and mezlocillin were about equally active (MIC50 both 16, MIC90 32 and 64 mg/l, respectively). For penicillin G, the MIC values were also favourable, the MIC90 being 32 mg/l. The possible causes for the discrepancy between the good in vitro activity and the clinical ineffectiveness of penicillin G are discussed. The cumulative MIC values (50, 90%) for cefoxitin were 8 and 32 mg/l, respectively. The MIC's of latamoxef showed a wide distribution resulting in a low MIC50 (4 mg/l) and a high MIC90 (128 mg/l). This distribution was due to the differing susceptibility of the individual species within the Bacteroides fragilis group. For B. thetaiotaomicron the highest MIC values were determined. This species as a whole was less susceptible to the beta-lactam antibiotics tested. The non beta-lactam antibiotics showed no substantial species related differences. No relevant differences between the individual laboratories were observed.
采用琼脂稀释法检测了197株脆弱拟杆菌属菌株(109株脆弱拟杆菌、27株多形拟杆菌、23株普通拟杆菌、1株狄氏拟杆菌、11株卵形拟杆菌及其他菌株)对青霉素G、头孢西丁、拉氧头孢、哌拉西林、美洛西林、克林霉素、甲硝唑、四环素、多西环素和氯霉素的敏感性。奥地利的4个微生物实验室参与了此项研究。所有实验室均采用相同方法并进行联合质量控制。活性最强的药物是甲硝唑和克林霉素(MIC50分别为1.0和0.5;二者的MIC90均为4mg/L)。四环素活性较弱,而多西环素在治疗相关浓度下可抑制大部分菌株(MIC50分别为16和2mg/L,MIC90分别为32和16mg/L)。氯霉素的MIC90为8mg/L。哌拉西林和美洛西林活性大致相同(MIC50均为16,MIC90分别为32和64mg/L)。青霉素G的MIC值也较为理想,MIC90为32mg/L。讨论了青霉素G体外活性良好但临床无效的可能原因。头孢西丁的累积MIC值(50%、90%)分别为8和32mg/L。拉氧头孢的MIC呈现广泛分布,导致MIC50较低(4mg/L)而MIC90较高(128mg/L)。这种分布是由于脆弱拟杆菌属内不同菌种敏感性不同所致。多形拟杆菌的MIC值最高。总体而言,该菌种对所检测的β-内酰胺类抗生素敏感性较低。非β-内酰胺类抗生素未显示出与菌种相关的显著差异。各实验室之间未观察到相关差异。