Shield Tracey, Bayliss Kerin, Hodkinson Alexander, Panagioti Maria, Wearden Alison, Flynn Jackie, Rowland Christine, Bee Penny, Farquhar Morag, Harris Danielle, Grande Gunn
Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Nov;13(8):1-70. doi: 10.3310/HTJY8442.
Family carers are central in supporting patients nearing end of life. As a consequence, they often suffer detrimental impacts on their own mental health. Understanding what factors may affect carers' mental health is important in developing strategies to maintain their psychological well-being during caregiving.
To conduct a systematic review and thematic evidence synthesis of factors related to carers' mental health during end-of-life caregiving.
Searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Social Sciences Citation Index, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects 1 January 2009-24 November 2019. We included observational quantitative studies focusing on adult informal/family carers for adult patients at end of life cared for at home considering any factor related to carer mental health (anxiety, depression, distress and quality of life) pre-bereavement. Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used. Thematic analysis with box score presentation, and meta-analysis were done where data permitted.
Findings from 63 included studies underpinned seven emergent themes. (31 studies): worse patient psychological symptoms and quality of life were generally associated with worse carer mental health. Patient depression was associated with higher depression in carers (standardised mean difference = 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.87, = 77%). Patients' other symptoms and functional impairment may relate to carer mental health, but findings were unclear. (14 studies): impact on carers' lives, task difficulty and general burden had clear associations with worse carer mental health. (8 studies): family dynamics and the quality of the carer-patient relationship may be important for carer mental health and are worthy of further investigation. (6 studies): insufficient resources may relate to carers' mental health and warrant further study. (13 studies): self-efficacy and preparedness were related to better mental health. However, findings regarding coping strategies were mixed. (18 studies): informal support given by family and friends may relate to better carer mental health, but evidence on formal support is limited. Having unmet needs was related to worse mental health, while satisfaction with care was related to better mental health. (16 studies): older age was generally associated with better carer mental health and being female was associated with worse mental health.
Studies were mainly cross-sectional (56) rather than longitudinal (7) which raises questions about the likely causal direction of relationships. One-third of studies had samples < 100, so many had limited statistical power to identify existing relationships.
Future work must adopt a comprehensive approach to improving carers' mental health because factors relating to carer mental health cover a broad spectrum. The literature on this topic is diverse and difficult to summarise, and the field would benefit from a clearer direction of enquiry guided by explanatory models. Future research should (1) further investigate quality of relationships and finances; (2) better define factors under investigation; (3) establish, through quantitative causal analyses, why factors might relate to mental health; and (4) utilise longitudinal designs more to aid understanding of likely causal direction of associations.
This study is registered as PROSPERO registration 2019 CRD42019130279 at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme HSDR 18/01/01 and is published in full in . See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
家庭照顾者在支持临终患者方面发挥着核心作用。因此,他们自身的心理健康往往会受到不利影响。了解哪些因素可能影响照顾者的心理健康,对于制定在照顾过程中维持其心理健康的策略非常重要。
对临终照顾期间与照顾者心理健康相关的因素进行系统评价和主题证据综合分析。
检索MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsychINFO、社会科学引文索引、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库和效果综述摘要数据库,检索时间为2009年1月1日至2019年11月24日。我们纳入了观察性定量研究,这些研究聚焦于在家中接受照顾的成年临终患者的成年非正式/家庭照顾者,考虑任何与照顾者心理健康(焦虑、抑郁、痛苦和生活质量)相关的丧亲前因素。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表。在数据允许的情况下,进行了带箱形分数展示的主题分析和荟萃分析。
63项纳入研究的结果支持了七个新出现的主题。(31项研究):患者较差的心理症状和生活质量通常与照顾者较差的心理健康相关。患者抑郁与照顾者较高的抑郁水平相关(标准化均差 = 0.59,95%置信区间0.32至0.87,P = 77%)。患者的其他症状和功能障碍可能与照顾者的心理健康有关,但结果尚不清楚。(14项研究):对照顾者生活的影响、任务难度和总体负担与照顾者较差的心理健康有明显关联。(8项研究):家庭动态和照顾者与患者关系的质量可能对照顾者的心理健康很重要,值得进一步研究。(6项研究):资源不足可能与照顾者的心理健康有关,值得进一步研究。(13项研究):自我效能感和准备情况与较好的心理健康相关。然而,关于应对策略的研究结果不一。(18项研究):家人和朋友给予的非正式支持可能与照顾者较好的心理健康有关,但关于正式支持的证据有限。有未满足的需求与较差的心理健康有关,而对护理的满意度与较好的心理健康有关。(16项研究):年龄较大通常与照顾者较好的心理健康相关,而女性与较差的心理健康相关。
研究主要是横断面研究(56项)而非纵向研究(7项),这引发了关于关系可能的因果方向的问题。三分之一的研究样本量<100,因此许多研究识别现有关系的统计能力有限。
未来的工作必须采取全面的方法来改善照顾者的心理健康,因为与照顾者心理健康相关的因素涵盖范围广泛。关于这个主题的文献多样且难以总结,该领域将受益于由解释模型引导的更清晰的研究方向。未来的研究应该:(1)进一步调查关系质量和财务状况;(2)更好地定义所研究的因素;(3)通过定量因果分析确定因素与心理健康相关的原因;(4)更多地使用纵向设计来帮助理解关联的可能因果方向。
本研究在https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/上注册为PROSPERO注册号2019 CRD42019130279。
本奖项由国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)健康与社会保健交付研究计划HSDR 18/01/01资助,并全文发表。有关更多奖项信息,请参阅NIHR资助与奖项网站。