Suppr超能文献

照顾者参与的研究:系统评价和叙述性综合。

Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

机构信息

King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.

Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13940. doi: 10.1111/hex.13940.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

As patient and public involvement (PPI) in research has become increasingly common, research-based recommendations on its principles and impacts have been established. The specifics of conducting PPI are likely to differ when involving different groups. Family/informal carers for those with health conditions or disabilities have a lot to contribute to research, but instances of their involvement have yet to be reviewed.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and synthesize studies where family/informal carers have been involved in the research process, to develop an understanding of the benefits, barriers and facilitating factors.

METHODS

A search of five electronic databases was conducted using a combination of terms relating to carers, involvement and research. A grey literature search, expert consultation and hand-searching were also used. Following screening, data extraction and quality assessment, a narrative synthesis incorporating thematic analysis was conducted.

FINDINGS

A total of 55 studies met the inclusion criteria, with diverse design and participatory approaches. Four themes were identified, relating to the outcomes, challenges, and practicalities of involving carers: (re) building relationships with carers; carers as equals not afterthoughts; carers have unique experiences; carers create change. Full involvement throughout the research was not always possible, due to barriers from the research world and responsibilities of the caring role. The literature demonstrated ways for carers to contribute in ways that suited them, maximizing their impact, while attending to relationships and power imbalances.

CONCLUSION

By summarizing the reported instances of carer involvement in research, this review brings together different examples of how successful research partnerships can be built with carers, despite various challenges. Carers are a heterogeneous group, and participatory approaches should be tailored to specific situations. Wider understanding of the challenges of conducting empowering research with carers, and the resources required to address these, are needed.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

The initial findings and themes were presented to a group of carers who had been involved in research and whose reflections informed the final synthesis.

摘要

介绍

随着患者和公众参与(PPI)研究的日益普及,已经制定了关于其原则和影响的基于研究的建议。涉及不同群体时,进行 PPI 的具体方式可能会有所不同。有健康问题或残疾的人的家属/非正式照顾者有很多可以为研究做出贡献,但他们参与的情况尚未得到审查。

目的

系统地回顾和综合研究中涉及家属/非正式照顾者参与研究过程的情况,以了解其益处、障碍和促进因素。

方法

使用与照顾者、参与和研究相关的术语组合,对五个电子数据库进行了搜索。还进行了灰色文献搜索、专家咨询和手工搜索。经过筛选、数据提取和质量评估后,进行了包含主题分析的叙述性综合。

结果

共有 55 项研究符合纳入标准,设计和参与方法多种多样。确定了四个主题,涉及照顾者参与的结果、挑战和实际问题:(重新)与照顾者建立关系;照顾者是平等的,而不是事后考虑的;照顾者有独特的经验;照顾者创造变革。由于研究界的障碍和照顾角色的责任,并非总是可以在整个研究过程中充分参与。文献表明了照顾者以适合他们的方式做出贡献的方式,最大限度地发挥他们的影响力,同时关注关系和权力不平衡。

结论

通过总结照顾者参与研究的报告实例,本综述汇集了与照顾者建立成功研究伙伴关系的不同例子,尽管存在各种挑战。照顾者是一个异质群体,参与方法应根据具体情况进行调整。需要更广泛地了解与照顾者进行赋权研究的挑战,以及解决这些挑战所需的资源。

患者和公众参与

最初的发现和主题呈现给了一组参与过研究的照顾者,他们的反馈意见为最终综合提供了信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28f0/10734554/2b89497cc3c9/HEX-27-e13940-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验