Suppr超能文献

代孕与先进治疗性医药产品的估值:在证据生成/评估连续统一体中找准位置。

Surrogacy and the Valuation of ATMPs: Taking Our Place in the Evidence Generation/Assessment Continuum.

作者信息

Gladwell Daniel, Ciani Oriana, Parnaby Adam, Palmer Stephen

机构信息

Lumanity, Sheffield, UK.

SDA Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Feb;42(2):137-144. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01334-y. Epub 2023 Nov 22.

Abstract

Medical technology is advancing rapidly, but established methods for health technology assessment are struggling to keep up. This challenge is particularly stark for the assessment of advanced therapy medicinal products-therapies often launched on the basis of single-arm studies powered to a surrogate primary endpoint. The most robust surrogacy methods investigate trial-level correlations between the treatment effect on the surrogate and the outcome of ultimate interest. However, these methods are often impossible with the evidence usually available for advanced therapy medicinal products at the time of the launch (randomized controlled trials are necessary for these advanced methods). Additionally, these surrogacy relationships are usually considered to be technology specific, adding uncertainty for any approach that primarily relies on historic data to estimate the surrogacy relationship for novel interventions such as advanced therapy medicinal products. The literature has already highlighted the need for early dialogue, staged assessment processes, and pricing arrangements that responsibly share the risk between the manufacturer and payer. However, it is our view that in addition to these critical developments, the modeling methods employed could also improve. Currently, health technology assessment practitioners typically either ignore the surrogate and simply extrapolate the endpoint of greatest patient relevance irrespective of the degree of maturity or assume historic surrogate relationships apply to the novel technology. In this opinion piece, we outline an additional avenue. By drawing on the understanding of the mechanism of action and insights generated earlier in the evidence generation/assessment continuum, cost-effectiveness modelers can make better use of the wider data available. These efforts are expected to reduce uncertainty at the time of the initial launch of pharmaceutical products and increase the value of subsequent data collection efforts.

摘要

医疗技术正在迅速发展,但现有的卫生技术评估方法却难以跟上步伐。对于先进治疗药品的评估而言,这一挑战尤为严峻——这类疗法往往是基于以替代主要终点为指标的单臂研究而推出的。最可靠的替代指标方法是研究治疗对替代指标的效果与最终关注结果之间的试验层面的相关性。然而,对于先进治疗药品上市时通常可获得的证据(这些先进方法需要随机对照试验)而言,这些方法往往无法实施。此外,这些替代关系通常被认为是特定于技术的,这给任何主要依靠历史数据来估计诸如先进治疗药品等新型干预措施的替代关系的方法增添了不确定性。文献已经强调了早期对话、分阶段评估流程以及在制造商和支付方之间合理分担风险的定价安排的必要性。然而,我们认为,除了这些关键进展之外,所采用的建模方法也可以改进。目前,卫生技术评估从业者通常要么忽略替代指标,仅仅外推与患者相关性最大的终点,而不考虑其成熟程度,要么假定历史替代关系适用于新技术。在这篇观点文章中,我们概述了另一条途径。通过借鉴对作用机制的理解以及在证据生成/评估连续过程早期所产生的见解,成本效益建模人员可以更好地利用更广泛可用的数据。这些努力预计将减少药品初次上市时的不确定性,并增加后续数据收集工作的价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验