Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0294039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294039. eCollection 2023.
The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma changed a lot in the last few years. This study aimed to assess the treatment sequences and outcomes for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a real-world setting.
We enrolled patients with metastatic renal cell carcinomawho received first-line systemic treatment with tyrosin kinase inhibitors monotherapy, ipilimumab plus nivolumab, or pembrolizumab plus axitinibbetween January2009 and May 2023 on the database of TriNetX network. Overall survival, time on treatment and time to next treatment were evaluated using Kaplan-Meiermethod.
Totally, 4183 received tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy, 1555 received ipilimumab plus nivolumab, and 559 received axitinib plus pembrolizumab. Median time on treatment was 2.5 months for the tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy cohort, 5.4 months for the ipilimumab plus nivolumab cohort, and 8.3 months for the pembrolizumab plus axitinib cohort. Median time to next treatment was 16.6 months for both the tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy and ipilimumab plus nivolumab cohorts, and 22.1 months for the pembrolizumab plus axitinib cohort. Median overall survival was 42.2 months for the tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy cohort, 39.7monthsfor the ipilimumab plus nivolumab cohort, and not reached for the pembrolizumab plus axitinib cohort. In comparison with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy cohort, patients in the pembrolizumab plus axitinib cohort showed survival benefit (log-rank p = 0.0168) in overall survival, but not the case in the ipilimumab plus nivolumab cohort.
There was a trend toward using first-line immuno-oncology based therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a real-world practice. Axitinib plus pembrolizumuab cohort had survival benefits over tyrosine kinase inhibitor and ipilimumab plus nivolumab cohorts, while patients in the ipilimumab plus nivolumab cohort had more distant metastases and comorbidities.
近年来,转移性肾细胞癌的治疗格局发生了很大变化。本研究旨在评估真实环境中转移性肾细胞癌的治疗顺序和结果。
我们招募了 2009 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月期间在 TriNetX 网络数据库中接受一线系统治疗的转移性肾细胞癌患者,包括酪氨酸激酶抑制剂单药治疗、伊匹单抗联合纳武单抗或帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼治疗。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法评估总生存期、治疗时间和下一治疗时间。
共有 4183 例接受酪氨酸激酶抑制剂单药治疗,1555 例接受伊匹单抗联合纳武单抗治疗,559 例接受阿昔替尼联合帕博利珠单抗治疗。酪氨酸激酶抑制剂单药治疗组的中位治疗时间为 2.5 个月,伊匹单抗联合纳武单抗组为 5.4 个月,帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼组为 8.3 个月。酪氨酸激酶抑制剂单药治疗组和伊匹单抗联合纳武单抗组的中位下一治疗时间均为 16.6 个月,帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼组为 22.1 个月。酪氨酸激酶抑制剂单药治疗组的中位总生存期为 42.2 个月,伊匹单抗联合纳武单抗组为 39.7 个月,帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼组未达到。与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂单药治疗组相比,帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼组的患者在总生存期方面具有生存获益(对数秩检验,p = 0.0168),但伊匹单抗联合纳武单抗组并非如此。
在真实实践中,转移性肾细胞癌患者一线免疫肿瘤治疗的应用呈上升趋势。阿昔替尼联合帕博利珠单抗组的生存获益优于酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和伊匹单抗联合纳武单抗组,而伊匹单抗联合纳武单抗组的患者有更多远处转移和合并症。