Suppr超能文献

锥形束计算机断层扫描分析下颌阻生第三磨牙与相邻第二磨牙牙根外吸收的关系

Relationship between the impacted mandibular third molar and adjacent second molar' external root resorption by cone-bean computed tomography analysis.

作者信息

Cui L, Jiang E, Liu Z, Li J

机构信息

Department of Stomatology Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University No.1327 of Juzi Road, Xinxing District Yanji 133000, China

出版信息

Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2024 Jan 1;29(1):e27-e35. doi: 10.4317/medoral.26044.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The relationship between the impacted mandibular third molar (IMTM) and the external root resorption (ERR) of the mandibular second molar (MSM) was analysed with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The risk factors affecting the ERR of the MSM were examined to provide a reference.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 327 patients (total: 578 teeth) admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University for IMTM extraction from January 2017 to December 2019 was chosen and divided according to gender and age. The correlation between the IMTM and ERR of MSM was analysed, including inclination angle, impaction direction and depth. The relationship of mandibular ascending ramus classification with ERR of MSM was also analysed. In addition, the correlation between the MTM impaction type and the severity of ERR was analysed.

RESULTS

The incidence of ERR of MSM in male patients was higher than in females (27.9% vs.17.6%, p = 0.018). The occurrence and the site of ERR showed statistical differences in the inclination angle [(≤20°, 3.6%) vs. (21°-40°, 27.1%) vs. (41°-60°, 27.6%) vs. (61°-80°, 25.6%) vs. (>80°, 31.7%), p <0.001], impaction direction [(Vertical, 1.1%) vs. (Mesial, 32.7%) vs. (Horizontal, 25.3%), p <0.001] and depth of MTM [(Low position, 38.6%) vs. (Median position, 32.0%) vs. (High position, 13.7%), p <0.001]. Also, there was a significant difference in the mandibular ascending ramus type [(Class I, 17.4%) vs. (Class II, 32.3%) vs. (Class III, 44.9%), p <0.001]. In addition, the severity of ERR showed statistical differences in the mesial (40.9%, p<0.05), lower impaction (54.5%, p<0.05) depth of MTM and type III of mandibular ascending ramus (63.6%, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The inclination angle, impaction direction, and depth of MTM were the influencing factors for the occurrence and site of ERR. Also, mandibular ascending ramus type was the impact fact. For MTM with mesioangular, lower impaction, and mandibular ascending ramus with type III, the ERR of the MSM was severer.

摘要

背景

采用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)分析下颌阻生第三磨牙(IMTM)与下颌第二磨牙(MSM)牙根外吸收(ERR)之间的关系。研究影响MSM牙根外吸收的危险因素,为临床提供参考依据。

材料与方法

选取2017年1月至2019年12月在延边大学附属医院因IMTM而住院拔牙的患者327例(共578颗牙齿),并按性别、年龄分组。分析IMTM与MSM牙根外吸收的相关性,包括倾斜角度、阻生方向和深度。分析下颌升支分类与MSM牙根外吸收的关系。此外,分析MTM阻生类型与牙根外吸收严重程度之间的相关性。

结果

男性患者MSM牙根外吸收的发生率高于女性(27.9%比17.6%,p = 0.018)。牙根外吸收的发生情况及部位在倾斜角度[(≤20°,3.6%)比(21°-40°,27.1%)比(41°-60°,27.6%)比(61°-80°,25.6%)比(>80°,31.7%),p <0.001]、阻生方向[(垂直型,1.1%)比(近中型,32.7%)比(水平型,25.3%),p <0.001]和MTM深度[(低位,38.6%)比(中位,32.0%)比(高位,13.7%),p <0.001]方面存在统计学差异。下颌升支类型也存在显著差异[(I类,17.4%)比(II类,32.3%)比(III类, 44.9%),p <0.001]。此外,牙根外吸收的严重程度在MTM近中(40.9%,p<0.05)、低位阻生(54.5%,p<0.05)深度及下颌升支III类(63.6%,p<0.05)方面存在统计学差异。

结论

MTM的倾斜角度、阻生方向和深度是牙根外吸收发生及部位的影响因素。下颌升支类型也是影响因素之一。对于近中倾斜、低位阻生的MTM及III类下颌升支,MSM牙根外吸收更严重。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9fb/10765336/2fdfb63de7ff/medoral-29-e27-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验