• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专职医疗人员临床督导的可及性与有效性:一项横断面调查。

Access to and effectiveness of clinical supervision for allied health workers: A cross-sectional survey.

作者信息

Snowdon David A, Kent Fiona, Farlie Melanie K, Taylor Nicholas F, Howlett Owen, Downie Sharon, Gardner Marcus

机构信息

National Centre for Healthy Aging, Melbourne, Australia.

Peninsula Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2024 May;46(5):640-647. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2271158. Epub 2023 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2023.2271158
PMID:37992284
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clinical supervision supports patient care and health worker wellbeing. However, access to effective clinical supervision is not equitable. We aimed to explore the access and effectiveness of clinical supervision in allied health workers.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey design using the Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale (MCSS-26), including open-ended survey responses, to collect data on effectiveness. Multivariable regression was conducted to determine how MCSS-26 scores differed across discipline, work location and setting. Open-ended responses were analysed using content analysis.

RESULTS

1113 workers completed the survey, with 319 (28%) reporting they did not receive supervision; this group were more likely to hold management positions, work in a medical imaging discipline and practice in a regional or rural location. For those who received supervision, MCSS-26 scores significantly differed between disciplines and work settings; psychologists and those practising in private practice settings (i.e. fee-for-service) reported the highest levels of effectiveness. Suggested strategies to enhance effectiveness included the use of alternate supervision models, dedicated time for supervision, and training.

CONCLUSION

Targeted subgroups for improving access include senior staff, medical imaging professionals, and those working across regional and rural settings. Where supervision was least effective, strategies to address behaviours with organisational support may be required.

摘要

引言

临床督导有助于患者护理和医护人员的福祉。然而,获得有效的临床督导并不公平。我们旨在探讨专职医疗人员获得临床督导的情况及其有效性。

方法

采用曼彻斯特临床督导量表(MCSS - 26)进行横断面调查设计,包括开放式调查回复,以收集有关有效性的数据。进行多变量回归分析以确定MCSS - 26分数在不同学科、工作地点和环境中的差异。使用内容分析法对开放式回复进行分析。

结果

1113名工作人员完成了调查,其中319人(28%)报告他们没有接受督导;这一组人员更有可能担任管理职务,从事医学影像学科工作,并在地区或农村地区执业。对于那些接受督导的人员,MCSS - 26分数在不同学科和工作环境之间存在显著差异;心理学家以及在私人执业环境(即按服务收费)中执业的人员报告的有效性水平最高。提高有效性的建议策略包括使用替代督导模式、专门的督导时间和培训。

结论

改善获得督导机会的目标亚组包括高级工作人员、医学影像专业人员以及在地区和农村地区工作的人员。在督导效果最差的地方,可能需要采取在组织支持下解决行为问题的策略。

相似文献

1
Access to and effectiveness of clinical supervision for allied health workers: A cross-sectional survey.专职医疗人员临床督导的可及性与有效性:一项横断面调查。
Med Teach. 2024 May;46(5):640-647. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2271158. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
2
Effectiveness of allied health clinical supervision following the implementation of an organisational framework.组织框架实施后,辅助医疗临床监管的效果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 26;22(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07636-9.
3
Can clinical supervision sustain our workforce in the current healthcare landscape? Findings from a Queensland study of allied health professionals.在当前的医疗环境中,临床督导能否维持我们的劳动力队伍?昆士兰对专职医疗人员的一项研究结果
Aust Health Rev. 2015 Sep;39(4):476-482. doi: 10.1071/AH14183.
4
Factors that contribute to high-quality clinical supervision of the rural allied health workforce: lessons from the coalface.有助于对农村辅助医疗人员进行高质量临床监督的因素:来自实际工作的经验教训。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jan;43(6):682-688. doi: 10.1071/AH17258.
5
Effectiveness of Clinical Supervision of Allied Health Professionals: A Survey.专职医疗人员临床督导的有效性:一项调查
J Allied Health. 2016 Summer;45(2):113-21.
6
Group clinical supervision for allied health professionals.团体临床督导:适用于辅助医疗专业人员
Aust J Rural Health. 2021 Aug;29(4):538-548. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12775. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
7
Effectiveness of Allied Health Clinical Supervision: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Supervisees.联合健康临床督导的有效性:对被督导者的横断面调查
J Allied Health. 2018 Summer;47(2):126-132.
8
Effective clinical supervision of allied health professionals: a mixed methods study.有效临床监督的辅助卫生专业人员:混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 31;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4873-8.
9
Setting priorities for rural allied health in Australia: a scoping review.澳大利亚农村相关卫生保健服务的重点制定:范围综述。
Rural Remote Health. 2020 Jun;20(2):5719. doi: 10.22605/RRH5719. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical supervision effectiveness in NHS nursing, medical and allied health professionals: Exploring interaction with workplace factors, supervision factors and burnout.英国国家医疗服务体系中护理、医疗及专职医疗专业人员的临床督导效果:探究与工作场所因素、督导因素及职业倦怠的相互作用
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e14149. doi: 10.1111/jep.14149. Epub 2024 Oct 22.