Lentskevich Marina A, Yau Alice, Figueroa Ariel E, Termanini Kareem M, Gosain Arun K
Division of Plastic Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Apr;62(4):545-557. doi: 10.1177/10556656231216834. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
ObjectiveBuccal myomucosal flaps (BMF) anatomically lengthen the palate in the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). We systematically reviewed the existing literature on speech outcome of BMF palatal lengthening.DesignThree databases were used to identify studies of interest published in English. Studies that did not use standardized speech assessments were excluded. PRISMA checklist was followed, and the risk of bias in the included studies was assessed.SettingLong-term follow up of patients.PatientsWith history of cleft palate presenting with VPI.InterventionBMF palatal lengthening.Main Outcome MeasureRandom-effects model meta-analyses were performed for hypernasality, intelligibility, and nasal air emission score improvements, which were derived from reported preoperative and postoperative scores, and controlled for variability of scales and timing of postoperative assessment.ResultsFrom the initial 7115 articles, 13 were included in this review. Two of these had a significant patient overlap and a study with a smaller patient population was excluded. All 12 included articles met the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool criteria. Six retrospective studies evaluated 230 patients and six prospective studies evaluated 181 patients. The most common indications for BMF were large size of the velopharyngeal gap and prior surgery for VPI. Meta-analyses demonstrated effect sizes below zero, confirming the improvement of standardized assessment scores in patients with VPI after BMF palatal lengthening. Egger regressions revealed low risk of publication bias.ConclusionsBMF palatal lengthening provides adequate treatment for VPI in patients with large velopharyngeal gap size and a history of prior unsuccessful surgery.
目的
颊肌黏膜瓣(BMF)在解剖学上可延长腭部,用于治疗腭咽闭合不全(VPI)。我们系统回顾了关于BMF腭部延长术语音结果的现有文献。
设计
使用三个数据库来识别以英文发表的相关研究。排除未使用标准化语音评估的研究。遵循PRISMA清单,并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。
设置
对患者进行长期随访。
患者
有腭裂病史且伴有VPI的患者。
干预
BMF腭部延长术。
主要结局指标
对鼻音过重、可懂度和鼻气流出评分的改善进行随机效应模型荟萃分析,这些评分来自术前和术后报告的分数,并控制了量表的可变性和术后评估的时间。
结果
从最初的7115篇文章中,本综述纳入了13篇。其中两篇有显著的患者重叠,排除了一篇患者数量较少的研究。所有12篇纳入文章均符合美国国立卫生研究院质量评估工具标准。六项回顾性研究评估了230例患者,六项前瞻性研究评估了181例患者。BMF最常见的适应证是腭咽间隙大及既往有VPI手术史。荟萃分析显示效应量低于零,证实BMF腭部延长术后VPI患者的标准化评估分数有所改善。Egger回归显示发表偏倚风险较低。
结论
BMF腭部延长术为腭咽间隙大且既往手术失败的VPI患者提供了充分的治疗。