Cauley J A, LaPorte R E, Sandler R B, Schramm M M, Kriska A M
Am J Clin Nutr. 1987 Jan;45(1):14-22. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/45.1.14.
Five methods for assessing physical activity were evaluated in a population of 255 white, postmenopausal women participating in a randomized trial on the effects of walking on bone loss. Methods were the Paffenbarger survey, a modified Paffenbarger, the large-scale integrated activity monitor (LSI), caloric intake, and the Baecke survey. Significant increase in physical activity was observed in the intervention group. Activity measures were weakly related to each other. Results of factor analyses suggest that factor I reflected voluntary leisure-time pursuits (such as walking) and factor II, activities of daily living. Participation in sports was not a significant contributor to overall activity of the women. Research on physical activity must define the particular dimension of activity measured. Several types of instruments should be used because different instruments reflect different activity patterns which, in turn, may be differentially related to disease.
在255名参与一项关于步行对骨质流失影响的随机试验的绝经后白人女性群体中,对五种评估身体活动的方法进行了评估。这些方法包括帕芬巴格调查问卷、改良版帕芬巴格问卷、大规模综合活动监测仪(LSI)、热量摄入以及贝克问卷。干预组的身体活动有显著增加。各项活动测量指标之间的相关性较弱。因子分析结果表明,因子I反映了自愿的休闲时间活动(如步行),因子II反映了日常生活活动。参与体育运动对这些女性的总体活动贡献并不显著。关于身体活动的研究必须明确所测量的活动的具体维度。应该使用多种类型的工具,因为不同的工具反映不同的活动模式,而这些活动模式反过来可能与疾病有不同的关联。