Suppr超能文献

将社会经济地位纳入考量可以减少对医保医院的再入院处罚。

Including socioeconomic status reduces readmission penalties to safety-net hospitals.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; William Tierney Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN; Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

William Tierney Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;79(3):685-693.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.11.027. Epub 2023 Nov 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) financially penalizes "excessive" postoperative readmissions. Concerned with creating a double standard for institutions treating a high percentage of economically vulnerable patients, Medicare elected to exclude socioeconomic status (SES) from its risk-adjustment model. However, recent evidence suggests that safety-net hospitals (SNHs) caring for many low-SES patients are disproportionately penalized under the HRRP. We sought to simulate the impact of including SES-sensitive models on HRRP penalties for hospitals performing lower extremity revascularization (LER).

METHODS

This is a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of national data on Medicare patients undergoing open or endovascular LER procedures between 2007 and 2009. We used hierarchical logistic regression to generate hospital risk-standardized 30-day readmission rates under Medicare's current model (adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, and procedure type) compared with models that also adjust for SES. We estimated the likelihood of a penalty and penalty size for SNHs compared with non-SNHs under the current Medicare model and these SES-sensitive models.

RESULTS

Our study population comprised 1708 hospitals performing 284,724 LER operations with an overall unadjusted readmission rate of 14.4% (standard deviation: 5.3%). Compared with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services model, adjusting for SES would not change the proportion of SNHs penalized for excess readmissions (55.1% vs 53.4%, P = .101) but would reduce penalty amounts for 38% of SNHs compared with only 17% of non-SNHs, P < .001.

CONCLUSIONS

For LER, changing national Medicare policy to including SES in readmission risk-adjustment models would reduce penalty amounts to SNHs, especially for those that are also teaching institutions. Making further strides toward reducing the national disparity between SNHs and non-SHNs on readmissions, performance measures require strategies beyond simply altering the risk-adjustment model to include SES.

摘要

目的

医疗保险的住院患者再入院率降低计划(HRRP)对“过度”术后再入院进行经济处罚。出于对为大量经济弱势群体患者提供治疗的机构制定双重标准的担忧,医疗保险选择将社会经济地位(SES)排除在其风险调整模型之外。然而,最近的证据表明,为许多 SES 较低的患者提供服务的安全网医院(SNH)在 HRRP 下受到不成比例的处罚。我们试图模拟将 SES 敏感模型纳入 HRRP 对进行下肢血运重建(LER)的医院的处罚的影响。

方法

这是一项基于 Medicare 患者在 2007 年至 2009 年期间接受开放或血管内 LER 手术的全国性数据的回顾性、横截面分析。我们使用分层逻辑回归来生成 Medicare 现行模型下(根据年龄、性别、合并症和手术类型进行调整)的医院风险标准化 30 天再入院率,并与同时调整 SES 的模型进行比较。我们根据 Medicare 现行模型和这些 SES 敏感模型,估计 SNH 与非 SNH 相比的受罚可能性和受罚规模。

结果

我们的研究人群包括 1708 家医院,共进行了 284724 例 LER 手术,总未调整的再入院率为 14.4%(标准差:5.3%)。与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的模型相比,调整 SES 不会改变因过度再入院而受处罚的 SNH 比例(55.1%对 53.4%,P=0.101),但与非 SNH 相比,将减少 38%的 SNH 的处罚金额,而仅减少 17%的非 SNH 的处罚金额,P<0.001。

结论

对于 LER,将 Medicare 的国家政策改为将 SES 纳入再入院风险调整模型中,将减少 SNH 的处罚金额,特别是对于那些同时也是教学机构的 SNH。要进一步缩小 SNH 和非 SNH 在再入院方面的全国性差异,绩效措施需要采取策略,不仅仅是改变风险调整模型以纳入 SES。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验