• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支架置入术后复杂左主干分叉病变的停留时间。

Residence time in complex left main bifurcation disease after stenting.

作者信息

Rigatelli Gianluca, Zuin Marco, Marchese Giuseppe, Rodino Giulio, Hiso Ervis, Mileva Niya, Vassilev Dobrin, Pasquetto Giampaolo

机构信息

Interventional Cardiology Unit, Division of Cardiology, Madre Teresa di Calcutta Hospital, AULSS 6, Ospedali Riuniti Padova Sud, Monselice, Italy.

Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Apr;61:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.11.013. Epub 2023 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2023.11.013
PMID:37996263
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the mean resident time (RT) after left main (LM) bifurcation stenting are scant. In the present study we performed a patient-specific computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis to investigate the different post-stenting mean RT values in LM patients treated with single-or double stenting techniques.

METHODS

Patients were identified after reviewing the local Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) scans database. Overall, 27 patients (mean age 65.5 ± 12.4, 21 males) [10 patients treated with provisional cross-over stenting, 7 with the double kissing crush (DK crush) and 10 with the nano-inverted T (NIT) technique, respectively] with isolated and significant LM bifurcation disease were analyzed.

RESULTS

After LM bifurcation stenting, the NIT showed a higher averages WSS values at all bifurcation sites compared to DK crush and provisional cross-over stenting. Moreover, the mean RT resulted lower after NIT compared to provisional or DK crush. During the diastolic phase, the average RT of the entire LM bifurcation was 0.46 s, 0.38 s and 0.33 s after using the provisional stenting, DK crush and NIT, respectively. Moreover, the average RT in the LM bifurcation decreased by 17.1 % using the DK crush and by 28.2 % using the NIT compared to the Provisional.

CONCLUSION

The present OCT-derived CFD analysis revealed that, in patients with complex bifurcation LM disease, the provisional approach resulted in lower WSS values, while double stenting techniques, especially the NIT technique, resulted in a marked reduction of average RT compared to the provisional approach.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

In the present study we performed a patient-specific Optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis to investigate the different post-stenting mean RT values in 27 patients treated with provisional cross-over stenting, DK crush and Nano-inverted-T (NIT) stenting. The NIT showed a higher averages WSS values at all bifurcation sites compared to DK crush and Provisional. The mean RT resulted lower in NIT compared to Provisional or DK crush. During the entire diastolic phase, the average RT of the entire LM bifurcation was 0.46 s, 0.38 s and 0.33 s after using the provisional stenting, DK crush and NIT, respectively. Moreover, the average RT in the entire LM bifurcation decreased by 17.1 % using the DK crush and by 28.2 % using the NIT compared to the Provisional.

摘要

背景

关于左主干(LM)分叉处支架置入术后平均驻留时间(RT)的数据很少。在本研究中,我们进行了针对患者的计算流体动力学(CFD)分析,以研究采用单支架或双支架技术治疗的LM患者支架置入术后不同的平均RT值。

方法

通过查阅当地光学相干断层扫描(OCT)扫描数据库确定患者。总共分析了27例(平均年龄65.5±12.4岁,21例男性)孤立性且严重的LM分叉病变患者[分别采用临时交叉支架置入术治疗10例、双吻挤压(DK挤压)术治疗7例和纳米倒置T(NIT)技术治疗10例]。

结果

LM分叉处支架置入术后,与DK挤压术和临时交叉支架置入术相比,NIT在所有分叉部位均显示出更高的平均壁面切应力(WSS)值。此外,与临时支架置入术或DK挤压术相比,NIT术后的平均RT更低。在舒张期,采用临时支架置入术、DK挤压术和NIT术后,整个LM分叉处的平均RT分别为0.46秒、0.38秒和0.33秒。此外,与临时支架置入术相比,采用DK挤压术时LM分叉处的平均RT降低了17.1%,采用NIT时降低了28.2%。

结论

目前基于OCT的CFD分析显示,在复杂分叉LM病变患者中,临时支架置入术导致较低的WSS值,而双支架技术,尤其是NIT技术,与临时支架置入术相比,可显著降低平均RT。

摘要

在本研究中,我们进行了针对患者的基于光学相干断层扫描(OCT)的计算流体动力学(CFD)分析,以研究27例采用临时交叉支架置入术、DK挤压术和纳米倒置T(NIT)支架置入术治疗的患者支架置入术后不同的平均RT值。与DK挤压术和临时支架置入术相比,NIT在所有分叉部位均显示出更高的平均WSS值。与临时支架置入术或DK挤压术相比,NIT的平均RT更低。在整个舒张期,采用临时支架置入术、DK挤压术和NIT术后,整个LM分叉处的平均RT分别为0.46秒、0.38秒和0.33秒。此外,与临时支架置入术相比,采用DK挤压术时整个LM分叉处的平均RT降低了17.1%,采用NIT时降低了28.2%。

相似文献

1
Residence time in complex left main bifurcation disease after stenting.支架置入术后复杂左主干分叉病变的停留时间。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Apr;61:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.11.013. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
2
Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial.双对吻挤压术与预扩张支架术治疗左主干远端分叉病变的随机对照研究(DKCRUSH-V 研究)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 28;70(21):2605-2617. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1066. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
3
3-Year Outcomes of the DKCRUSH-V Trial Comparing DK Crush With Provisional Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions.比较DK Crush与临时支架置入术治疗左主干分叉病变的DKCRUSH-V试验的3年结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 14;12(19):1927-1937. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.056. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
4
A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the DKCRUSH-II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) trial.一项比较双对吻挤压与预扩张支架术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的随机临床试验:来自 DKCRUSH-II 试验(双对吻挤压与预扩张支架术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的对比研究)的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 22;57(8):914-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.023.
5
Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions).冠状动脉分叉病变双吻挤压术与临时支架置入术的临床结局:多中心随机DKCRUSH-II研究(冠状动脉分叉病变双吻挤压技术与临时支架置入技术的随机研究)的5年随访结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb;10(2):e004497. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497.
6
Optimal Site for Proximal Optimization Technique in Complex Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.复杂冠状动脉分叉病变支架置入术近端优化技术的最佳部位:计算流体动力学研究。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Jul;21(7):826-832. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.12.015. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
7
Clinical Outcomes Following Coronary Bifurcation PCI Techniques: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comprising 5,711 Patients.冠状动脉分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗技术的临床结局:包含 5711 例患者的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 22;13(12):1432-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.054.
8
A Bayesian meta-analysis of double kissing (DK) crush or provisional stenting for coronary artery bifurcation lesions.贝叶斯荟萃分析双重吻合法(DK)挤压或临时支架置入治疗冠状动脉分叉病变。
Indian Heart J. 2024 Mar-Apr;76(2):113-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2024.03.004. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
9
Clinical Outcome After DK Crush Versus Culotte Stenting of Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: The 3-Year Follow-Up Results of the DKCRUSH-III Study.DK Crush 与 Culotte 支架术治疗左主干远端分叉病变的临床结果:DKCRUSH-III 研究的 3 年随访结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 24;8(10):1335-1342. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.017.
10
Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis demonstrates superiority of double-kissing crush in complex lesions.冠状动脉分叉病变的支架置入技术:系统评价和网络荟萃分析显示,在复杂病变中,双对吻挤压术优于其他技术。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Jul;111(7):761-775. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01979-9. Epub 2021 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduced Shear Stress and Longer Blood Flow Time Occur in Both Severe Focal and Mild Diffuse LAD Lesions: Angiograms Alone Don't Always Reveal Their True Impact on Blood Flow.严重局灶性和轻度弥漫性左前降支病变均会出现剪切应力降低和血流时间延长的情况:仅血管造影并不总能揭示它们对血流的真正影响。
Pathophysiology. 2025 Jun 19;32(2):28. doi: 10.3390/pathophysiology32020028.
2
Comment: The Balloon-Assisted Double-Kissing T-Stenting Technique: Concept, In Vitro Model, and Case Examples.评论:球囊辅助双吻T形支架置入技术:概念、体外模型及病例示例
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Jul 22;3(8):102197. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102197. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Biomechanical factors and atherosclerosis localization: insights and clinical applications.
生物力学因素与动脉粥样硬化定位:见解与临床应用
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 25;11:1392702. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1392702. eCollection 2024.