Lan Tianwei, Liu Yonghao, Yuan Yongnian, Liu Hongliang, Liu Hongguang, Zhang Shunfeng, Wang Shunxiang
College of Mining, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, China.
Ordos Institute of Liaoning Technical University, Ordos, China.
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 23;13(1):20576. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47907-x.
In order to study the mining pressure characteristics of the shallow buried coal seam with the same silo working face under the very close mining void zone and the overlying coal rock body, the theoretical analysis is used to determine whether the open-cutting eye bearing layer belongs to the mining under the very close mining void zone or not, based on the numerical simulation of FLAC3D and on-site measurement of the working resistance at the end of the cycle of the working face's hydraulic bracket, It is proposed to divide the mining stress of the working face based on the advancing length of the working face, that is, the high-pressure zone, the transition zone and the low-pressure zone. The results of the study show that: FLAC software was used to analyze the stress intensity of the "C" island working face when it was mined back to 50 m, 100 m, 150 m, and 180 m (one time "square"), and the simulation results were imported into the Origin software, which was used to analyze the stress intensity of the working face. The simulation results were imported into Origin software, and the influence range of mining stress was divided into four areas: high-stress area, stress transition area, low-stress area, and "square" stress concentration area. According to the on-site measurement of the working resistance at the end of hydraulic support cycle, the initial pressure step of the working face under the overlying coal rock body is 48.9-55.7 m, with the peak value of 38 MPa, the cycle pressure step is 9.0-23.3 m, with the peak value of 36 MPa, and the dynamic load factor of the working face is 1.14-1.16; relative to the overlying coal rock body, the average decrease of the cycle pressure step is nearly 10% and the average increase of dynamic load factor is 1.14-1.16; compared with that under the overlying coal rock body, the average decrease of the cycle pressure step is nearly 10% and the average increase of dynamic load factor is 1.14-1.16. Compared with the overlying coal rock body, the average decrease of the cycle pressure step under the overlying mining zone is nearly 10%, the average increase of the dynamic load factor is 20%, and there is no obvious regularity and periodicity in the direction of strike, and the working face is divided into three parts along the direction of strike: high-pressure zone, transition zone, and low-pressure zone. Therefore, in the process of mining under the overlying coal rock body, we should strengthen the roadway peripheral rock support and roof and floor management, which is of guiding significance to the mining of similar working faces and mine safety production.
为研究极近距离采空区及上覆煤岩体下同一筒仓工作面浅埋煤层的采动压力特征,采用理论分析确定开切眼承载层是否属于极近距离采空区下开采,基于FLAC3D数值模拟及工作面液压支架循环末工作阻力现场实测,提出根据工作面推进长度划分工作面采动应力,即高压区、过渡区和低压区。研究结果表明:利用FLAC软件分析“C”岛工作面回采至50m、100m、150m和180m(一次“方”)时的应力强度,并将模拟结果导入Origin软件分析工作面应力强度。模拟结果导入Origin软件后,将采动应力影响范围划分为高应力区、应力过渡区、低应力区和“方”形应力集中区。根据液压支架循环末工作阻力现场实测,上覆煤岩体下工作面初次来压步距为48.9 - 55.7m,峰值为38MPa,周期来压步距为9.0 - 23.3m,峰值为36MPa,工作面动载系数为1.14 - 1.16;相对于上覆煤岩体,周期来压步距平均减小近10%,动载系数平均增大1.14 - 1.16;与上覆煤岩体下相比,周期来压步距平均减小近10%,动载系数平均增大1.14 - 1.16。与上覆煤岩体相比,上覆采空区下周期来压步距平均减小近10%,动载系数平均增大20%,走向方向无明显规律性和周期性,工作面沿走向划分为三部分:高压区、过渡区和低压区。因此,在上覆煤岩体下开采过程中,应加强巷道围岩支护和顶板底板管理,对类似工作面开采及矿井安全生产具有指导意义。