• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速微流控免疫荧光抗原检测评估新冠病毒感染者的传染性。

The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1, Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.

Department of Microbiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, 1-1-1, Minami-Kogushi, Ube, 755-8505, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):823. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08821-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-023-08821-9
PMID:37996783
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10668452/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A test-based strategy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the measures to assess the need for isolation and prevention of infection. However, testing with high sensitivity methods, such as quantitative RT-PCR, leads to unnecessary isolation, whereas the lateral flow antigen test shows low sensitivity and false negative results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag test (Lumira Ag), a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence method, in assessing infectivity.

METHODS

This study was performed from March 2022 to July 2022. A pair of nasopharyngeal swab samples were obtained from each patient with mild COVID-19. One swab was used for Lumira Ag testing, and the other for quantitative RT-PCR testing and virus culture.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were included in the study. Among them, PCR, Lumira Ag test, and virus culture indicated positivity for 82, 66, and 24 patients, respectively. When comparing the Lumira Ag test to virus culture, its sensitivity was 100.0% (24/24), specificity, 30.0% (18/60); positive predictive value, 36.3% (24/66); and negative predictive value (NPV), 100.0% (18/18). The positive sample for virus culture was observed until the ninth day from the onset of symptoms, while the Lumira Ag test was observed until day 11.

CONCLUSIONS

The Lumira Ag test showed high sensitivity and NPV (100% each) compared to virus culture. A test-based strategy using the Lumira Ag test can effectively exclude COVID-19 infectiousness.

摘要

背景

针对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的基于检测的策略是评估隔离和感染预防需求的措施之一。然而,使用高灵敏度方法(如定量 RT-PCR)进行检测会导致不必要的隔离,而侧向流动抗原检测则显示出低灵敏度和假阴性结果。本研究旨在评估 LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag 测试(Lumira Ag)的性能,这是一种快速的微流控免疫荧光法,用于评估传染性。

方法

本研究于 2022 年 3 月至 2022 年 7 月进行。从每例轻度 COVID-19 患者中采集一对鼻咽拭子样本。一个拭子用于 Lumira Ag 检测,另一个用于定量 RT-PCR 检测和病毒培养。

结果

共有 84 例患者纳入研究。其中,PCR、Lumira Ag 检测和病毒培养分别显示 82、66 和 24 例患者阳性。将 Lumira Ag 检测与病毒培养进行比较,其灵敏度为 100.0%(24/24),特异性为 30.0%(18/60);阳性预测值为 36.3%(24/66);阴性预测值(NPV)为 100.0%(18/18)。病毒培养的阳性样本一直观察到症状出现后的第 9 天,而 Lumira Ag 检测则观察到第 11 天。

结论

与病毒培养相比,Lumira Ag 检测显示出高灵敏度和 NPV(均为 100%)。基于检测的策略使用 Lumira Ag 检测可以有效排除 COVID-19 的传染性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaf4/10668452/9e858dd7782c/12879_2023_8821_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaf4/10668452/f0ac67ea00e7/12879_2023_8821_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaf4/10668452/9e858dd7782c/12879_2023_8821_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaf4/10668452/f0ac67ea00e7/12879_2023_8821_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaf4/10668452/9e858dd7782c/12879_2023_8821_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The evaluation of a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence antigen test in detecting the infectiousness of COVID-19 patients.快速微流控免疫荧光抗原检测评估新冠病毒感染者的传染性。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):823. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08821-9.
2
Performance of the LumiraDx Microfluidic Immunofluorescence Point-of-Care SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test in Asymptomatic Adults and Children.LumiraDx 微流控免疫荧光即时 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测在无症状成人和儿童中的性能。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2022 Apr 1;157(4):602-607. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqab173.
3
Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer.鼻拭子和咽拭子在无症状人群中用于 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的比较,以及从剩余缓冲液中用 RT-PCR 直接确认。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0245521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02455-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
4
Rapid Antigen Test LumiraDx vs. Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.LumiraDx 快速抗原检测与实时聚合酶链反应用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;19(7):3826. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073826.
5
[Evaluation of the Rapid Antigen Detection Kit with the Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Samples].[用于呼吸道样本中检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的快速抗原检测试剂盒与聚合酶链反应的评估]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022 Apr;56(2):263-273. doi: 10.5578/mb.20229806.
6
Evaluation of a novel, rapid antigen detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.评估一种新型的 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 29;16(11):e0259527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259527. eCollection 2021.
7
Sars-Cov-2 antigen tests predict infectivity based on viral culture: comparison of antigen, PCR viral load, and viral culture testing on a large sample cohort.Sars-Cov-2 抗原检测基于病毒培养预测传染性:对大样本队列的抗原、PCR 病毒载量和病毒培养检测的比较。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Jan;29(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.010. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
8
Time scale performance of rapid antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2: Evaluation of 10 rapid antigen assays.时间尺度性能的快速抗原检测 SARS-CoV-2:评估 10 种快速抗原检测。
J Med Virol. 2021 Dec;93(12):6512-6518. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27186. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
9
Field Evaluation of the New Rapid NG-Test SARS-CoV-2 Ag for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in the Emergency Department of an Academic Referral Hospital.新的快速 NG-Test SARS-CoV-2 Ag 在学术转诊医院急诊科用于 COVID-19 诊断的现场评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 25;10:840984. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.840984. eCollection 2022.
10
Bean Extract-Based Gargle for Efficient Diagnosis of Active COVID-19 Infection Using Rapid Antigen Tests.基于豆提取物的含漱液可用于使用快速抗原检测高效诊断活动性 COVID-19 感染。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0161421. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01614-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Au@Pt@Pd nanozymes based lateral flow immunoassay for quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in nasal swab samples.基于 Au@Pt@Pd 纳米酶的侧向流免疫分析用于定量检测鼻腔拭子样本中的 SARS-CoV-2 核衣壳蛋白。
Mikrochim Acta. 2024 Nov 7;191(12):730. doi: 10.1007/s00604-024-06819-x.
2
Assessing the performance of LumiraDx™ SARS-CoV-2 Ag test in detecting Omicron lineages: 2022-2023 study.评估LumiraDx™ SARS-CoV-2抗原检测在检测奥密克戎谱系中的性能:2022 - 2023年研究
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 18;10(12):e33229. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33229. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Daily use of lateral flow devices by contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases to enable exemption from isolation compared with standard self-isolation to reduce onward transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in England: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.接触者每日使用侧向流动检测装置以替代标准自我隔离来免除隔离,从而减少英格兰 SARS-CoV-2 的传播:一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Nov;10(11):1074-1085. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00267-3. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
2
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
3
Sars-Cov-2 antigen tests predict infectivity based on viral culture: comparison of antigen, PCR viral load, and viral culture testing on a large sample cohort.
Sars-Cov-2 抗原检测基于病毒培养预测传染性:对大样本队列的抗原、PCR 病毒载量和病毒培养检测的比较。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Jan;29(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.010. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
Duration of infectious shedding of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and its relation with symptoms.奥密克戎变异株的传染性排出时间及其与症状的关系。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Feb;29(2):221-224. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.009. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
5
Duration of Shedding of Culturable Virus in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (BA.1) Infection.新型冠状病毒奥密克戎(BA.1)感染中可培养病毒的脱落持续时间。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 21;387(3):275-277. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2202092. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
6
A nationwide analytical and clinical evaluation of 44 rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 compared to RT-qPCR.一项针对 44 种 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测试剂的全国性分析和临床评估,与 RT-qPCR 相比。
J Clin Virol. 2022 Aug;153:105214. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105214. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
7
Comparison of Home Antigen Testing With RT-PCR and Viral Culture During the Course of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.在 SARS-CoV-2 感染过程中,家庭抗原检测与 RT-PCR 和病毒培养的比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Jul 1;182(7):701-709. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1827.
8
The Usefulness of Antigen Testing in Predicting Contagiousness in COVID-19.抗原检测在预测 COVID-19 传染性方面的作用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0196221. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01962-21. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
9
Duration of Infectious Virus Shedding by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant-Infected Vaccinees.奥密克戎变异株感染者的传染性病毒脱落持续时间。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2022 May;28(5):998-1001. doi: 10.3201/eid2805.220197. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
10
Relationship of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen and Reverse Transcription PCR Positivity for Viral Cultures.新型冠状病毒抗原与病毒培养物逆转录 PCR 阳性的关系。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;28(3):717-720. doi: 10.3201/eid2803.211747.