Grigoryan M Zh, Kazumyan S V, Makeeva M K, Arzukanyan A V, Khabadze Z S, Sokhova I A
Peoples Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2023;102(6):5-8. doi: 10.17116/stomat20231020615.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the duration of fixation of adhesive films in the treatment of traumatic lesions of the oral mucosa.
The patients were divided into 2 groups. In the first group, the affected area was covered with an adhesive film with solcoseryl, in the second group with a film with vitamin E. The film was glued to the affected area according to the instructions, the time of gluing was recorded, patients were warned about the need to notify researchers via messengers or SMS messages about the time of peeling or resorption of the film. The evaluation was carried out by the method of variation statistics (Student's t-test for independent samples).
The retention time of the film in the oral cavity was expressed in minutes, the average value in group 1 was 48.4±9.19, in group 2 - 127.70±49.07. Thus, the fixation of the film with vitamin E was longer than the films with solcoseryl (=0.000180).
Both films provided sufficient protective effect during the retention period. However, in clinical situations where a longer barrier protective effect to the damaged oral mucosa surface is required, it is advisable to use a vitamin E healing patch.
本研究旨在评估粘膜粘附片在治疗口腔粘膜创伤性病变中的固定持续时间。
将患者分为2组。第一组，在患区覆盖含舒康博的粘膜粘附片，第二组覆盖含维生素E的粘膜粘附片。按照说明书将贴片粘贴于患区，记录粘贴时间，告知患者需要通过即时通讯工具或短信向研究人员通报贴片脱落或吸收的时间。采用变异统计方法（独立样本t检验）进行评估。
贴片在口腔内的保留时间以分钟表示，第一组平均值为48.4±9.19，第二组为127.70±49.07。因此，含维生素E的贴片固定时间长于含舒康博的贴片（P=0.000180）。
两种贴片在保留期间均提供了足够的保护作用。然而，在临床情况中，如果需要对受损口腔粘膜表面提供更长时间的屏障保护作用，建议使用维生素E愈合贴片。
