• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下肢假肢干预使用者和资助者核心结局集(PI-COS)的制定:为假肢健康经济评估中衡量的益处提供信息的一步。

Development of a Core Outcome Set for users and funders of lower-limb prosthetic interventions (PI-COS): a step to inform the benefits measured in prosthetic health economic evaluations.

作者信息

Clarke Leigh, Ridgewell Emily, Dillon Michael P

机构信息

Discipline of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Sep;46(19):4407-4419. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2275279. Epub 2023 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2023.2275279
PMID:37997443
Abstract

PURPOSE

Little is known about the outcomes that are most important to prosthesis users and funders. A Prosthetic Interventions Core Outcome Set (PI-COS) will help researchers and practitioners measure outcomes that are the most important to prosthesis users and funders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prosthesis users and funders rated the importance of 121 International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) second-level categories using a two-round Delphi survey. A Consensus Meeting using the nominal group technique resolved rating differences between groups. The ICF second-level categories were ranked according to importance and a K-Means Cluster Analysis helped establish the PI-COS.

RESULTS

65 users and 8 funders completed the Delphi surveys, followed by a Consensus Meeting. 26 ICF second-level categories were considered important to prosthesis users and funders and a PI-COS of 14 ICF second-level categories drawn predominantly from five ICF chapters was established: and .

CONCLUSIONS

The PI-COS describes the outcomes that are most important to prosthesis users and funders. The PI-COS can help focus on the most important outcome measures in clinical practice and research, including future prosthetic health economic evaluations.

摘要

目的

对于假肢使用者和资助者而言,哪些结果最为重要,目前所知甚少。一个假肢干预核心结局集(PI-COS)将有助于研究人员和从业者衡量对假肢使用者和资助者最为重要的结果。

材料与方法

假肢使用者和资助者通过两轮德尔菲调查对121个国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)二级类别进行重要性评级。使用名义群体技术的共识会议解决了各群体之间的评级差异。根据重要性对ICF二级类别进行排序,聚类分析有助于确定PI-COS。

结果

65名使用者和8名资助者完成了德尔菲调查,随后召开了共识会议。26个ICF二级类别被认为对假肢使用者和资助者很重要,并确定了一个主要来自ICF五个章节的14个ICF二级类别的PI-COS:……

结论

PI-COS描述了对假肢使用者和资助者最为重要的结果。PI-COS有助于在临床实践和研究中聚焦于最重要的结局指标,包括未来的假肢健康经济评估。

相似文献

1
Development of a Core Outcome Set for users and funders of lower-limb prosthetic interventions (PI-COS): a step to inform the benefits measured in prosthetic health economic evaluations.下肢假肢干预使用者和资助者核心结局集(PI-COS)的制定:为假肢健康经济评估中衡量的益处提供信息的一步。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Sep;46(19):4407-4419. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2275279. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
2
Identifying and linking prosthetic outcomes to the ICF framework: a step to inform the benefits measured in prosthetic health economic evaluations.识别假肢结果并将其与国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)框架相联系:为告知假肢健康经济评估中所衡量的益处迈出的一步。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Mar;45(6):1103-1113. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2049902. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
3
Content comparison of utility and effectiveness instruments to the Prosthetic Interventions Core Outcome Set: a step to inform the benefits measured in lower-limb prosthetic health economic evaluations.与假肢干预核心结局集相比,效用和有效性工具的内容比较:为下肢假肢健康经济评估中衡量的益处提供信息的一步。
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Apr;47(7):1861-1871. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2384627. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
4
Development of the assessment standards of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Geriatric Core Set through a modified Delphi method.采用改良德尔菲法制定国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)老年核心组评估标准。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04816-6.
5
Upper limb prosthetic outcome measures: review and content comparison based on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.上肢假肢的疗效评估:基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的综述与内容比较
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010 Jun;34(2):109-28. doi: 10.3109/03093641003776976.
6
The measurement of functioning using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments.使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类测量功能:qualifier 评级与现有健康状况量表的比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):541-548. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1381186. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
7
A content comparison of 4 commonly used adult upper limb amputee outcome measurements with application of the refinements of International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health linking rules.对 4 种常用的成人上肢截肢者结局测量方法进行内容比较,这些方法应用了国际功能、残疾和健康分类链接规则的改进。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Aug 1;48(4):448-454. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000283. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
8
Systematic review of concepts measured in individuals with lower limb amputation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference.以《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》为参考,对下肢截肢个体所测量概念的系统评价。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011 Sep;35(3):262-8. doi: 10.1177/0309364611412821.
9
IMBA-ICF linking by integrating consensus methods: How group consensus of experts can contribute to in-depth linking of instruments to the ICF.通过整合共识方法进行 IMBA-ICF 链接:专家小组共识如何有助于深入链接工具与 ICF。
Work. 2023;75(2):479-493. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210256.
10
Validation of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) core sets for musculoskeletal conditions in a primary health care setting from physiotherapists' perspective using the Delphi method.从物理治疗师的角度出发,使用德尔菲法对国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)在基层医疗环境中的肌肉骨骼疾病核心集进行验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jul;45(15):2458-2468. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2096128. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Health economic evaluation of trans-tibial prosthetic suspension systems: a protocol for a pilot using an observational study and synthetic cohort.经胫骨假肢悬吊系统的卫生经济评估:一项使用观察性研究和合成队列的试点研究方案
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2025 Apr 12;23(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12962-025-00611-1.