Wiser Healthcare and Healthy Environments and Lives Network, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Western Health Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2024 Mar;52(2):91-104. doi: 10.1177/0310057X231212211. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
A shift in practice by anaesthetists away from anaesthetic gases with high global warming potential towards lower emission techniques (e.g. total intravenous anaesthesia) could result in significant carbon savings for the health system. The purpose of this qualitative interview study was to understand anaesthetists' perspectives on the carbon footprint of anaesthesia, and views on shifting practice towards more environmentally sustainable options. Anaesthetists were recruited from four hospitals in Western Sydney, Australia. Data were organised according to the capability-opportunity-motivation model of behaviour change. Twenty-eight anaesthetists were interviewed (July-September 2021). Participants' age ranged from 29 to 62 years (mean 43 years), 39% were female, and half had completed their anaesthesia training between 2010 and 2019. Challenges to the wider use of greener anaesthetic agents were identified across all components of the capability-opportunity-motivation model: capability (gaps in clinician skills and experience, uncertainty regarding research evidence); opportunity (norms, time, and resource pressures); and motivation (beliefs, habits, responsibility and guilt). Suggestions for encouraging a shift to more environmentally friendly anaesthesia included access to education and training, implementing guidelines and audit/feedback models, environmental restructuring, improving resource availability, reducing low value care, and building the research evidence base on the safety of alternative agents and their impacts on patient outcomes. We identified opportunities and challenges to reducing the carbon footprint of anaesthesia in Australian hospitals by way of system-level and individual behavioural change. Our findings will be used to inform the development of communication and behavioural interventions aiming to mitigate carbon emissions of healthcare.
麻醉师从温室效应潜能高的麻醉气体转向排放更低的技术(如全静脉麻醉),可能会为卫生系统节省大量碳。本定性访谈研究的目的是了解麻醉师对麻醉碳足迹的看法,以及对转向更具环境可持续性选择的看法。在澳大利亚西悉尼的四家医院招募了麻醉师。数据根据行为改变的能力-机会-动机模型进行组织。对 28 名麻醉师进行了访谈(2021 年 7 月至 9 月)。参与者的年龄从 29 岁到 62 岁(平均年龄 43 岁),39%为女性,一半人在 2010 年至 2019 年期间完成了麻醉培训。在能力-机会-动机模型的所有组成部分都发现了更广泛使用更环保的麻醉剂的挑战:能力(临床医生技能和经验的差距,对研究证据的不确定性);机会(规范、时间和资源压力);以及动机(信念、习惯、责任和内疚)。鼓励向更环保的麻醉转变的建议包括获得教育和培训、实施指南和审核/反馈模式、环境结构调整、改善资源可用性、减少低价值护理以及建立替代药物安全性及其对患者结果影响的研究证据基础。我们确定了通过系统层面和个人行为改变来减少澳大利亚医院麻醉碳足迹的机会和挑战。我们的研究结果将用于为旨在减轻医疗保健碳排放的沟通和行为干预措施的制定提供信息。