Medical Research and Biometrics Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Population Health Research Institute and Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Dec;8(12):e968-e977. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00244-X.
Although socioeconomic inequality in cardiovascular health has long been a public health focus, the differences in cardiovascular-disease burden and mortality between people with different socioeconomic statuses has yet to be adequately addressed. We aimed to assess the effects of socioeconomic status, measured via three socioeconomic-status indicators (ie, education, occupation, and household wealth and a composite socioeconomic-status disparity index, on mortality and cardiovascular-disease burden (ie, incidence, mortality, and admission to hospital) in China.
For this analysis, we used data from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE)-China cohort study, which enrolled adults aged 35-70 years from 115 urban and rural areas in 12 provinces in China between Jan 1, 2005, and Dec 31, 2009. Final follow-up was on Aug 30, 2021. Indicators of socioeconomic status were education, occupation, and household wealth; these individual indicators were also used to create an integrated socioeconomic-status index via latent class analysis. Standard questionnaires administered by trained researchers were used to obtain baseline data and were supplemeted by physical measurements. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular-disease mortality, non-cardiovascular-disease mortality, major cardiovascular disease, and cardiovascular-disease admission to hospital. Hazard ratios (HRs) and average marginal effects were used to assess the association between the primary outcomes and socioeconomic status.
Of 47 931 participants enrolled in the PURE-China study, 47 278 (98·6%) had complete information on sex and follow-up. After excluding 1189 (2·5%) participants with missing data on education, household wealth, and occupation at baseline, 46 089 participants were included in this analysis. Median follow-up was 11·9 years (IQR 9·5-12·6); 26 860 (58·3%) of 46 089 participants were female and 19 229 (41·7%) were male. Having no or primary education, unskilled occupation, or being in the lowest third of household wealth was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular-disease mortality, non-cardiovascular-disease mortality, major cardiovascular disease, and cardiovascular-disease admission to hospital compared with having higher education, a professional or managerial occupation, or more household wealth. After adjustment for confounders, people categorised as having low integrated socioeconomic status based on the index had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1·65 [95% CI 1·42-1·92]), cardiovascular-disease mortality (2·19 [1·68-2·85]), non-cardiovascular disease mortality (1·43 [1·18-1·72]), major cardiovascular disease (1·43 [1·27-1·61]) and cardiovascular-disease admission to hospital (1·14 [1·01-1·28]) compared with people categorised as having high integrated socioeconomic status.
Socioeconomic-status inequalities in mortality and cardiovascular-disease outcomes exist in China. Targeted policies of equal health-care resource allocation should be promoted to equitably benefit people with fewer years of education and less household wealth.
Funding sources are listed at the end of the Article.
尽管心血管健康方面的社会经济不平等问题长期以来一直是公共卫生关注的焦点,但不同社会经济地位人群的心血管疾病负担和死亡率差异仍未得到充分解决。我们旨在评估社会经济地位(通过三个社会经济地位指标衡量,即教育、职业和家庭财富以及综合社会经济地位差异指数)对中国人群死亡率和心血管疾病负担(即发病率、死亡率和住院率)的影响。
本分析使用了来自前瞻性城乡流行病学(PURE)-中国队列研究的数据,该研究于 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 12 月 31 日期间从中国 12 个省份的 115 个城乡地区招募了 35-70 岁的成年人。最终随访时间为 2021 年 8 月 30 日。社会经济地位的指标是教育、职业和家庭财富;这些个体指标也通过潜在类别分析被用于创建一个综合的社会经济地位指数。经过培训的研究人员使用标准问卷获取基线数据,并进行了身体测量。主要结局是全因死亡率、心血管疾病死亡率、非心血管疾病死亡率、主要心血管疾病和心血管疾病住院。使用危害比(HR)和平均边际效应来评估主要结局与社会经济地位之间的关联。
在参与 PURE-中国研究的 47931 名参与者中,有 47278 名(98.6%)有完整的性别和随访信息。在排除了 1189 名(2.5%)基线时在教育、家庭财富和职业方面缺失数据的参与者后,46089 名参与者被纳入本分析。中位随访时间为 11.9 年(IQR 9.5-12.6);46089 名参与者中,26080 名(58.3%)为女性,19229 名(41.7%)为男性。与接受更高教育、专业或管理职业或更多家庭财富的人相比,没有或只有小学教育、非技术职业或处于家庭财富最低三分之一的人全因死亡率、心血管疾病死亡率、非心血管疾病死亡率、主要心血管疾病和心血管疾病住院率的风险更高。在调整混杂因素后,根据指数被归类为低综合社会经济地位的人全因死亡率(HR 1.65 [95%CI 1.42-1.92])、心血管疾病死亡率(2.19 [1.68-2.85])、非心血管疾病死亡率(1.43 [1.18-1.72])、主要心血管疾病(1.43 [1.27-1.61])和心血管疾病住院率(1.14 [1.01-1.28])的风险更高。
中国存在与社会经济地位相关的死亡率和心血管疾病结局不平等。应推行有针对性的公平医疗资源分配政策,使受教育程度较低和家庭财富较少的人群平等受益。
文章末尾列出了资金来源。