Division of Human Development and Disability, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Research Participation Programs, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Division of Human Development and Disability, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Disabil Health J. 2024 Apr;17(2):101556. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2023.101556. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
The term "developmental disability" (DD) is inconsistently defined and applied depending on purpose and across sources, including in legislation.
This project aimed to identify existing definitions of disability and DD and to determine the extent to which each definition could be operationalized to produce prevalence estimates using data from U.S. national surveys.
Using data among children <18 years from the 2016-2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH), we estimated the prevalence of two definitions of disability (Washington Group Short Set on Functioning, American Community Survey) and seven definitions of DD [Health and Human Services (ever/current), Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (1+, 2+, or 3+ components), and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed (ever/current)]. Complex sample design variables and weights were used to calculate nationally representative prevalence.
Disability (NHIS: 5.2-6.3%; NSCH: 9.2-11.9%) and DD prevalence (NHIS: 0.6-18.0% and NSCH: 0.2-22.2%) varied depending on the definition and data source. For the same definition, NSCH prevalence estimates tended to be higher than NHIS estimates.
The substantial variability in estimated prevalence of disability and DD among children in the United States may be in part due to the surveys not representing all components of each definition. Different or additional questions in national surveys may better capture existing definitions of disability and DD. Considering the data collection goals may help determine the optimal definition to provide useful information for public health action.
“发育障碍”(DD)这一术语的定义和应用因目的和来源而异,包括在法规中。
本项目旨在确定现有的残疾和 DD 定义,并确定每个定义在多大程度上可以通过使用来自美国全国调查的数据来产生患病率估计值。
使用 2016-2018 年全国健康访谈调查(NHIS)和全国儿童健康调查(NSCH)中<18 岁儿童的数据,我们估计了残疾的两种定义(华盛顿小组功能简短集)和七种 DD 定义(卫生和人类服务部(曾经/当前)、发育障碍援助和权利法案 2000 年(1+、2+或 3+部分)以及《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》,第 5 版(曾经/当前))的患病率。使用复杂样本设计变量和权重来计算全国代表性的患病率。
残疾(NHIS:5.2-6.3%;NSCH:9.2-11.9%)和 DD 患病率(NHIS:0.6-18.0%和 NSCH:0.2-22.2%)因定义和数据源而异。对于相同的定义,NSCH 的患病率估计值往往高于 NHIS 的估计值。
美国儿童残疾和 DD 患病率的估计值存在很大差异,部分原因可能是调查没有代表每个定义的所有组成部分。全国调查中使用不同或额外的问题可能会更好地捕捉到残疾和 DD 的现有定义。考虑数据收集目标可能有助于确定提供公共卫生行动有用信息的最佳定义。