Stamm Brian, Lineback Christina M, Tang Mengxuan, Jia Dan Tong, Chrenka Ella, Sorond Farzaneh A, Sabayan Behnam
Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 8;12(22):6979. doi: 10.3390/jcm12226979.
Cytotoxic lesions of the corpus callosum (CLOCCs) have broad differential diagnoses. Differentiating these lesions from lesions of vascular etiology is of high clinical significance. We compared the clinical and radiological characteristics and outcomes between vascular splenial lesions and CLOCCs in a retrospective cohort study. We examined the clinical and radiologic characteristics and outcomes in 155 patients with diffusion restriction in the splenium of the corpus callosum. Patients with lesions attributed to a vascular etiology (N = 124) were older (64.1 vs. 34.6 years old, < 0.001) and had >1 vascular risk factor (91.1% vs. 45.2%, < 0.001), higher LDL and A1c levels, and echocardiographic abnormalities (all ≤ 0.05). CLOCCs (N = 31) more commonly had midline splenial involvement ( < 0.001) with only splenial diffusion restriction ( < 0.001), whereas vascular etiology lesions were more likely to have multifocal areas of diffusion restriction ( = 0.002). The rate of in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with vascular etiology lesions ( = 0.04). Across vascular etiology lesions, cardio-embolism was the most frequent stroke mechanism (29.8%). Our study shows that corpus callosum diffusion restricted lesions of vascular etiology and CLOCCs are associated with different baseline, clinical, and radiological characteristics and outcomes. Accurately differentiating these lesions is important for appropriate treatment and secondary prevention.
胼胝体细胞毒性病变(CLOCCs)有广泛的鉴别诊断。将这些病变与血管性病因的病变区分开来具有很高的临床意义。在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们比较了血管性压部病变和CLOCCs的临床、放射学特征及预后。我们检查了155例胼胝体压部有弥散受限的患者的临床和放射学特征及预后。血管性病因病变的患者(N = 124)年龄更大(64.1岁对34.6岁,<0.001),有>1个血管危险因素的比例更高(91.1%对45.2%,<0.001),低密度脂蛋白和糖化血红蛋白水平更高,且有超声心动图异常(均≤0.05)。CLOCCs(N = 31)更常见中线压部受累(<0.001)且仅有压部弥散受限(<0.001),而血管性病因病变更可能有多灶性弥散受限区域(P = 0.002)。血管性病因病变患者的院内死亡率显著更高(P = 0.04)。在血管性病因病变中,心源性栓塞是最常见的卒中机制(29.8%)。我们的研究表明,血管性病因的胼胝体弥散受限病变和CLOCCs与不同的基线、临床和放射学特征及预后相关。准确区分这些病变对于恰当治疗和二级预防很重要。