Park Jeongyong, Park Goeun, Kim Da Seul, Kim Minha, Heo Sejin, Jeong Daun, Chang Hansol, Lee Se Uk, Choi Goosang, Lee Gun Tak, Shin Tae Gun, Park Jong Eun, Hwang Sung Yeon
Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06355, Republic of Korea.
Biomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 13;12(22):7055. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227055.
We sought to determine whether blade size influences the first-pass success (FPS) rate when performing endotracheal intubation (ETI) with a C-MAC video laryngoscope (VL) in emergency department (ED) patients. This single-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted between August 2016 and July 2022. A total of 1467 patients was divided into two categories based on the blade size used during the first ETI attempt: blade-3 (n = 365) and blade-4 groups (n = 1102). The primary outcome was the FPS rate. The secondary outcomes included the glottic view, multiple attempt rate, and ETI-related complications. We used propensity score matching to reduce the potential confounders between the two groups. Among these, 363 pairs of matched propensity scores were generated. The FPS rate did not differ between the blade-3 (84.8%) and blade-4 groups (87.3%) in the matched cohort ( = 0.335). The multiple attempt rate did not differ significantly between groups ( = 0.289) and was 3.9% and 2.5% in the blade-3 and blade-4 groups, respectively. The difficult glottic view (11.3 vs. 6.9%, = 0.039) and complication rates (15.4% vs. 10.5%, = 0.047) were significantly higher in the blade-3 group than in the blade-4 group. The FPS rates of ETI with the blade-3 and blade-4 groups in adult patients in the ED did not differ significantly.
我们试图确定在急诊科(ED)患者中使用C-MAC视频喉镜(VL)进行气管插管(ETI)时,镜片尺寸是否会影响首次通过成功率(FPS)。这项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究于2016年8月至2022年7月进行。根据首次ETI尝试时使用的镜片尺寸,将1467例患者分为两类:3号镜片组(n = 365)和4号镜片组(n = 1102)。主要结局是FPS率。次要结局包括声门视野、多次尝试率和ETI相关并发症。我们使用倾向评分匹配来减少两组之间的潜在混杂因素。其中,生成了363对匹配的倾向评分。在匹配队列中,3号镜片组(84.8%)和4号镜片组(87.3%)的FPS率没有差异(P = 0.335)。两组之间的多次尝试率没有显著差异(P = 0.289),3号镜片组和4号镜片组的多次尝试率分别为3.9%和2.5%。3号镜片组的困难声门视野(11.3%对6.9%,P = 0.039)和并发症发生率(15.4%对10.5%,P = 0.047)显著高于4号镜片组。急诊科成年患者中,3号镜片组和4号镜片组的ETI的FPS率没有显著差异。