Doctoral School, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Faculty of Dental Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University of Medicine, 040441 Bucharest, Romania.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Nov 19;59(11):2037. doi: 10.3390/medicina59112037.
: With the increased trend towards digitalization in dentistry, intraoral scanning has, to a certain extent, replaced conventional impressions in particular clinical settings. Trueness and precision are essential traits for optical impressions but have so far been incompletely explored. : We performed a study to evaluate the differences in the three-dimensional spatial orientations of implant analogs on a stone cast when using an intraoral scanner compared to a dental laboratory scanner. We assessed the deviation of the intraoral scans compared to the laboratory scan for three standardized implant measurement plans and compared these results with control scans of the neighboring natural teeth. : We found no statistically significant correlation between the measurements at the scan body level and the landmarks chosen as controls on the neighboring natural teeth ( = 0.198). The values for the implant scans presented wider variation compared to the control scans. The difference between the implant and the control planes ranged from -0.018 mm to +0.267 mm, with a median of -0.011 mm (IQR: -0.001-0.031 mm). While most values fell within a clinically acceptable margin of error of 0.05 mm, 12.5% of the measurements fell outside of this acceptable range and could potentially affect the quality of the resulting prosthetic work. : For single-unit implant-supported restorations, intraoral scanning might have enough accuracy. However, the differences that result when scanning with an intraoral scanner may affect the quality of prosthetic work on multiple implants, especially if they are screw-retained. Based on our results, we propose different adaptations of the prosthetic protocol to minimize the potential effect of errors that may occur during the digital workflow.
: 在数字化在牙科领域日益普及的背景下,口腔内扫描在某些特定临床情况下已经在一定程度上取代了传统印模。准确性和精密度是光学印模的重要特征,但迄今为止尚未得到充分探索。: 我们进行了一项研究,以评估与传统实验室扫描仪相比,在使用口腔内扫描仪时,模型上种植体模拟件的三维空间方位的差异。我们评估了三种标准化种植体测量计划的口腔内扫描与实验室扫描之间的偏差,并将这些结果与相邻天然牙的对照扫描进行了比较。: 我们发现,扫描体水平的测量值与作为相邻天然牙对照选择的标志点之间没有统计学上的显著相关性(=0.198)。种植体扫描的数值与对照扫描相比变化更大。种植体和对照平面之间的差异范围为-0.018 毫米至+0.267 毫米,中位数为-0.011 毫米(IQR:-0.001 毫米至 0.031 毫米)。虽然大多数值都在 0.05 毫米的临床可接受误差范围内,但 12.5%的测量值超出了这个可接受范围,可能会影响最终修复体的质量。: 对于单个单位的种植体支持修复体,口腔内扫描可能具有足够的准确性。然而,使用口腔内扫描仪扫描时产生的差异可能会影响多个种植体修复体的质量,尤其是在使用螺丝固位的情况下。基于我们的结果,我们提出了不同的修复体方案的适应方法,以最小化数字工作流程中可能出现的误差的潜在影响。