Suppr超能文献

患有冠状动脉血管舒缩障碍的心绞痛和非阻塞性冠状动脉(ANOCA)患者。

Angina and Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery (ANOCA) Patients with Coronary Vasomotor Disorders.

作者信息

La Sarena, Tavella Rosanna, Wu Jing, Pasupathy Sivabaskari, Zeitz Christopher, Worthley Matthew, Sinhal Ajay, Arstall Margaret, Spertus John A, Beltrame John F

机构信息

School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.

Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2023 Nov 10;13(11):2190. doi: 10.3390/life13112190.

Abstract

Angina and Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery (ANOCA) patients often lack a clear explanation for their symptoms, and are frequently discharged with the label of "unspecified chest pain", despite the availability of functional coronary angiography (provocative spasm and microvascular function testing) to identify potential underlying coronary vasomotor disorders. This study compared the outcomes of ANOCA patients with a coronary vasomotor disorder diagnosis post elective coronary angiography to patients discharged with unspecified chest pain. Using the CADOSA (Coronary Angiogram Database of South Australia) registry, consecutive symptomatic patients ( = 7555) from 2012 to 2018 underwent elective angiography; 30% had ANOCA (stenosis <50%). Of this cohort, 9% had documented coronary vasomotor disorders diagnosed, and 91% had unspecified chest pain. Patients with coronary vasomotor disorders were younger and had a similar female prevalence compared with those with unspecified chest pain. New prescriptions of calcium channel blockers and long-acting nitrates were more common for the coronary vasomotor cohort at discharge. In the 3 years following angiography, both groups had similar all-cause mortality rates. However, those with coronary vasomotor disorders had higher rates of emergency department visits for chest pain (39% vs. 15%, < 0.001) and readmissions for chest pain (30% vs. 10%, < 0.001) compared with those with unspecified chest pain. This real-world study emphasizes the importance of identifying high-risk ANOCA patients for personalized management to effectively address their symptoms.

摘要

心绞痛和非阻塞性冠状动脉(ANOCA)患者的症状往往缺乏明确的解释,尽管有功能性冠状动脉造影(激发试验和微血管功能测试)可用于识别潜在的冠状动脉血管舒缩障碍,但他们常常被贴上“不明原因胸痛”的标签出院。本研究比较了选择性冠状动脉造影后诊断为冠状动脉血管舒缩障碍的ANOCA患者与因不明原因胸痛出院患者的结局。利用南澳大利亚冠状动脉造影数据库(CADOSA)登记系统,对2012年至2018年连续出现症状的患者(n = 7555)进行了选择性血管造影;30%患有ANOCA(狭窄<50%)。在这一队列中,9%被记录诊断为冠状动脉血管舒缩障碍,91%为不明原因胸痛。与不明原因胸痛患者相比,冠状动脉血管舒缩障碍患者更年轻,女性患病率相似。出院时,冠状动脉血管舒缩障碍组使用钙通道阻滞剂和长效硝酸盐的新处方更为常见。在血管造影后的3年里,两组的全因死亡率相似。然而,与不明原因胸痛患者相比,冠状动脉血管舒缩障碍患者因胸痛到急诊科就诊的比例更高(39%对15%,P<0.001),因胸痛再次入院的比例也更高(30%对10%,P<0.001)。这项真实世界研究强调了识别高危ANOCA患者进行个性化管理以有效缓解其症状的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c34c/10672683/9ea60f96cf66/life-13-02190-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验