Psychological Process Research Team, Guardian Robot Project, RIKEN, Soraku-gun, Kyoto 619-0288, Japan.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;23(22):9076. doi: 10.3390/s23229076.
Although electromyography (EMG) remains the standard, researchers have begun using automated facial action coding system (FACS) software to evaluate spontaneous facial mimicry despite the lack of evidence of its validity. Using the facial EMG of the zygomaticus major (ZM) as a standard, we confirmed the detection of spontaneous facial mimicry in action unit 12 (AU12, lip corner puller) via an automated FACS. Participants were alternately presented with real-time model performance and prerecorded videos of dynamic facial expressions, while simultaneous ZM signal and frontal facial videos were acquired. Facial videos were estimated for AU12 using FaceReader, Py-Feat, and OpenFace. The automated FACS is less sensitive and less accurate than facial EMG, but AU12 mimicking responses were significantly correlated with ZM responses. All three software programs detected enhanced facial mimicry by live performances. The AU12 time series showed a roughly 100 to 300 ms latency relative to the ZM. Our results suggested that while the automated FACS could not replace facial EMG in mimicry detection, it could serve a purpose for large effect sizes. Researchers should be cautious with the automated FACS outputs, especially when studying clinical populations. In addition, developers should consider the EMG validation of AU estimation as a benchmark.
尽管肌电图 (EMG) 仍然是标准,但研究人员已经开始使用自动化面部动作编码系统 (FACS) 软件来评估自发性面部模仿,尽管缺乏其有效性的证据。我们使用颧大肌 (ZM) 的面部 EMG 作为标准,通过自动化 FACS 确认了对动作单元 12 (AU12,唇角牵拉器) 的自发性面部模仿的检测。参与者交替接受实时模型表现和动态面部表情的预录视频,同时获取 ZM 信号和额部面部视频。使用 FaceReader、Py-Feat 和 OpenFace 对面部视频进行 AU12 估计。自动化 FACS 的灵敏度和准确性均低于面部 EMG,但 AU12 模仿反应与 ZM 反应显著相关。所有三个软件程序都通过实时表演检测到增强的面部模仿。AU12 时间序列相对于 ZM 显示出大约 100 到 300 毫秒的延迟。我们的结果表明,虽然自动化 FACS 不能替代面部 EMG 进行模仿检测,但它可以用于大效应量的研究。研究人员应该谨慎对待自动化 FACS 的输出,尤其是在研究临床人群时。此外,开发人员应考虑将 AU 估计的 EMG 验证作为基准。