Suppr超能文献

虚拟注射软件可减少锥形束 CT 引导下前列腺动脉栓塞术的辐射暴露和操作时间。

Virtual Injection Software Reduces Radiation Exposure and Procedural Time of Prostatic Artery Embolization Performed with Cone-Beam CT.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Hôpital Tenon-Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Department of Interventional Radiology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

Réseau d'imagerie Sud Francilien, Service de Radiologie, Évry, France; Ramsay Sante, Service de Radiologie, Clinique du Mousseau, Évry, France.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024 Mar;35(3):409-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.11.012. Epub 2023 Nov 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of virtual injection software (VIS) use during cone-beam computed tomography (CT)-guided prostatic artery embolization (PAE) on both patient radiation exposure and procedural time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This institutional review board (IRB)-approved comparative retrospective study analyzed the treatment at a single institution of 131 consecutive patients from January 2020 to May 2022. Cone-beam CT was used with (Group 1, 77/131; 58.8%) or without VIS (Group 2, 54/131, 41.2%). Radiation exposure (number of digital subtraction angiography [DSA] procedures), dose area product (DAP), total air kerma (AK), peak skin dose (PSD), fluoroscopy time (FT), and procedure time (PT) were recorded. The influences of age, body mass index, radial access, and use of VIS were assessed.

RESULTS

In bivariate analysis, VIS use (Group 1) showed reduction in the number of DSA procedures (8.6 ± 3.7 vs 16.8 ± 4.3; P < .001), DAP (110.4 Gy·cm ± 46.8 vs 140.5 Gy·cm ± 61; P < .01), AK (642 mGy ± 451 vs 1,150 mGy ± 637; P = .01), PSD (358 mGy ± 251 vs 860 mGy ± 510; P = .001), FT (35.6 minutes ± 15.4 vs 46.6 minutes ± 20; P = .001), and PT (94.6 minutes ± 41.3 vs 115.2 minutes ± 39.6, P = .005) compared to those in Group 2. In multivariate analysis, AK, PSD, FT, and PT reductions were associated with VIS use (P < .001, P < .001, P = .001, and P = .006, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of VIS during PAE performed under cone-beam CT guidance led to significant reduction in patient radiation exposure and procedural time.

摘要

目的

评估在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)引导下前列腺动脉栓塞术(PAE)中使用虚拟注射软件(VIS)对患者放射暴露和手术时间的影响。

材料与方法

本研究为机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的回顾性比较研究,分析了 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 5 月在一家机构治疗的 131 例连续患者。使用(第 1 组,77/131;58.8%)或不使用 VIS(第 2 组,54/131,41.2%)进行 CBCT。记录放射暴露(数字减影血管造影[DSA]次数)、剂量面积乘积(DAP)、总空气比释动能(AK)、皮肤峰值剂量(PSD)、透视时间(FT)和手术时间(PT)。评估了年龄、体重指数、桡动脉入路和 VIS 使用的影响。

结果

在双变量分析中,VIS 使用(第 1 组)显示 DSA 次数(8.6 ± 3.7 与 16.8 ± 4.3;P <.001)、DAP(110.4 Gy·cm ± 46.8 与 140.5 Gy·cm ± 61;P <.01)、AK(642 mGy ± 451 与 1,150 mGy ± 637;P =.01)、PSD(358 mGy ± 251 与 860 mGy ± 510;P =.001)、FT(35.6 分钟 ± 15.4 与 46.6 分钟 ± 20;P =.001)和 PT(94.6 分钟 ± 41.3 与 115.2 分钟 ± 39.6,P =.005)均较第 2 组降低。在多变量分析中,AK、PSD、FT 和 PT 的降低与 VIS 的使用相关(P <.001、P <.001、P =.001 和 P =.006)。

结论

在锥形束 CT 引导下进行 PAE 时使用 VIS 可显著降低患者的放射暴露和手术时间。

相似文献

1
Virtual Injection Software Reduces Radiation Exposure and Procedural Time of Prostatic Artery Embolization Performed with Cone-Beam CT.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024 Mar;35(3):409-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.11.012. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
2
Radiation Dose in Prostatic Artery Embolization Using Cone-Beam CT and 3D Roadmap Software.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Sep;30(9):1452-1458. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.04.040. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
5
Improving Cone-Beam CT Angiography for Prostatic Artery Embolization: Is a Low-Dose Protocol Equivalent to the Standard?
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Apr;32(4):562-568. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.12.016. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
6
Prostatic Artery Embolization: Influence of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography on Radiation Exposure, Procedure Time, and Contrast Media Use.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Jul;44(7):1089-1094. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02787-4. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
7
Radiation Exposure of Patients and Interventional Radiologists during Prostatic Artery Embolization: A Prospective Single-Operator Study.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Apr;28(4):517-521. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
9
Semi-automatic prostatic artery detection using cone-beam CT during prostatic arterial embolization.
Acta Radiol. 2020 Aug;61(8):1116-1124. doi: 10.1177/0284185119891689. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
10
Prostatic Artery Embolization-Anatomic Predictors of Technical Outcomes.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Mar;31(3):378-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Prostate Artery Embolization with 4D-CT.
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2024 Aug 19;41(3):302-308. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788622. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse Event Classification: Clarification and Validation of the Society of Interventional Radiology Specialty-Specific System.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023 Jan;34(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.10.011. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
2
Use of Virtual Injection Technology for Planning and Guidance of Prostate Artery Embolization.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Jun;45(6):884-887. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03068-4. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
4
Advanced image guidance for prostatic artery embolization - a multicenter technical note.
CVIR Endovasc. 2021 Aug 10;4(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s42155-021-00249-z.
6
Prostatic Artery Embolization: Influence of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography on Radiation Exposure, Procedure Time, and Contrast Media Use.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Jul;44(7):1089-1094. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02787-4. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
7
Prostate artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: The hunt for the ideal patient population.
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2021 Mar;102(3):119-120. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
9
Semi-automatic prostatic artery detection using cone-beam CT during prostatic arterial embolization.
Acta Radiol. 2020 Aug;61(8):1116-1124. doi: 10.1177/0284185119891689. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
10
CIRSE Standards of Practice on Prostatic Artery Embolisation.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Feb;43(2):176-185. doi: 10.1007/s00270-019-02379-3. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验