• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声协议在急性主动脉夹层的评估(SPEED 协议):一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。

The sonographic protocol for the emergent evaluation of aortic dissections (SPEED protocol): A multicenter, prospective, observational study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Winchester Medical Center, Winchester, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Feb;31(2):112-118. doi: 10.1111/acem.14839. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1111/acem.14839
PMID:38010071
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

An aortic dissection (AoD) is a potentially life-threatening emergency with mortality rates exceeding 50%. While computed tomography angiography remains the diagnostic standard, patients may be too unstable to leave the emergency department. Investigators developed a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) protocol combining transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and the abdominal aorta. The study objective was to determine the test characteristics of this protocol.

METHODS

This was an institutional review board-approved, multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study of a convenience sample of adult patients. Patients suspected of having an AoD received a TTE and abdominal aorta POCUS. Three sonographic signs suggested AoD: a pericardial effusion, an intimal flap, or an aortic outflow track diameter measuring more than 35 mm. Investigators present continuous and categorical data as medians with interquartile ranges or proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and utilized standard 2 × 2 tables on MedCalc (Version 19.1.6) to calculate test characteristics with 95% CI.

RESULTS

Investigators performed 1314 POCUS examinations, diagnosing 21 Stanford type A and 23 Stanford type B AoD. Forty-one of the 44 cases had at least one of the aforementioned sonographic findings. The protocol has a sensitivity of 93.2% (95% CI 81.3-98.6), specificity of 90.9 (95% CI 89.2-92.5), positive and negative predictive values of 26.3% (95% CI 19.6-33.9) and 99.7% (95% CI 99.2-100), respectively, and an accuracy of 91% (95% CI 89.3-92.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The SPEED protocol has an overall sensitivity of 93.2% for AoD.

摘要

目的

主动脉夹层(AoD)是一种潜在危及生命的紧急情况,死亡率超过 50%。虽然计算机断层血管造影术仍然是诊断标准,但患者可能因不稳定而无法离开急诊室。研究人员开发了一种即时护理超声(POCUS)方案,结合了经胸超声心动图(TTE)和腹主动脉。研究目的是确定该方案的测试特征。

方法

这是一项机构审查委员会批准的多中心、前瞻性、观察性、队列研究,采用便利样本的成年患者。疑似患有 AoD 的患者接受 TTE 和腹主动脉 POCUS 检查。三个超声征象提示 AoD:心包积液、内膜瓣或主动脉流出道直径大于 35mm。研究人员以中位数和四分位距表示连续和分类数据,以比例和 95%置信区间(CI)表示分类数据,并利用 MedCalc(版本 19.1.6)上的标准 2×2 表计算具有 95%CI 的测试特征。

结果

研究人员共进行了 1314 次 POCUS 检查,诊断出 21 例 Stanford 型 A 和 23 例 Stanford 型 B AoD。44 例中有 41 例至少有上述超声发现之一。该方案的灵敏度为 93.2%(95%CI 81.3-98.6),特异性为 90.9%(95%CI 89.2-92.5),阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 26.3%(95%CI 19.6-33.9)和 99.7%(95%CI 99.2-100),准确性为 91%(95%CI 89.3-92.5)。

结论

SPEED 方案对 AoD 的总体灵敏度为 93.2%。

相似文献

1
The sonographic protocol for the emergent evaluation of aortic dissections (SPEED protocol): A multicenter, prospective, observational study.超声协议在急性主动脉夹层的评估(SPEED 协议):一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Feb;31(2):112-118. doi: 10.1111/acem.14839. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
2
Review article: Accuracy of emergency physician performed point-of-care ultrasound of the thoracic aorta: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the literature.综述文章:急诊医师行床旁超声检查胸主动脉的准确性:系统评价和文献综述的叙述性综合。
Emerg Med Australas. 2023 Oct;35(5):720-730. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14262. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography for the identification of proximal aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经胸超声心动图诊断近端主动脉夹层的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 11;13(1):5886. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32800-4.
4
Role of transesophageal echocardiography in dissection of the aorta and evaluation of degenerative aortic disease.经食管超声心动图在主动脉夹层及退行性主动脉疾病评估中的作用。
Cardiol Clin. 1993 Aug;11(3):461-73.
5
[Diagnostic goals in aortic dissection. Value of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography].[主动脉夹层的诊断目标。经胸和经食管超声心动图的价值]
Herz. 1992 Dec;17(6):321-37.
6
A 12-year Retrospective Cohort Study of Point-of-care Ultrasound and Aortic Dissection Risk Score in Type A Aortic Dissection.12 年回顾性队列研究:即时超声与主动脉夹层风险评分在 A 型主动脉夹层中的应用。
J Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;67(3):e288-e297. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.04.001. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
7
[Spiral CT in aortic dissection].
Dakar Med. 2004;49(1):28-31.
8
Diagnostic potential of combined transthoracic echocardiography and x-ray computed tomography in suspected aortic dissection.经胸超声心动图与X线计算机断层扫描联合应用对疑似主动脉夹层的诊断潜力
Clin Cardiol. 1999 May;22(5):345-52. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960220510.
9
Comparison of conventional and transesophageal echocardiography with magnetic resonance imaging for anatomical mapping of thoracic aortic dissection. A dual noninvasive imaging study with anatomical and/or angiographic validation.传统经胸超声心动图与经食管超声心动图用于胸主动脉夹层解剖定位并与磁共振成像比较:一项具有解剖学和/或血管造影验证的双无创成像研究
Int J Card Imaging. 1994 Mar;10(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/BF01151576.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography for acute type A aortic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经胸超声心动图对急性A型主动脉综合征的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed J. 2024 May 10;48(2):100747. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2024.100747.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute aortic syndrome.急性主动脉综合征
BMJ. 2024 Sep 17;386:e080870. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080870.
2
Renal and Genitourinary Ultrasound Evaluation in Emergency and Critical Care: An Overview.急诊与重症监护中的肾脏和泌尿生殖系统超声评估:概述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 7;12(13):1356. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131356.
3
Diagnosing aortic dissection: A review of this elusive, lethal diagnosis.诊断主动脉夹层:对这一难以捉摸的致命诊断的综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Jul 8;5(4):e13225. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13225. eCollection 2024 Aug.