Pharmacokinetics, Merck & Co. Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Research, Aduro Biotech Europe, Oss, The Netherlands.
MAbs. 2023 Jan-Dec;15(1):2285285. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2023.2285285. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
Monoclonal antibodies have become an important class of therapeutics in the last 30 years. Because the mechanism of action of therapeutic antibodies is intimately linked to their binding epitopes, identification of the epitope of an antibody to the antigen plays a central role during antibody drug development. The gold standard of epitope mapping, X-ray crystallography, requires a high degree of proficiency with no guarantee of success. Here, we evaluated six widely used alternative methods for epitope identification (peptide array, alanine scan, domain exchange, hydrogen-deuterium exchange, chemical cross-linking, and hydroxyl radical footprinting) in five antibody-antigen combinations (pembrolizumab+PD1, nivolumab+PD1, ipilimumab+CTLA4, tremelimumab+CTLA4, and MK-5890+CD27). The advantages and disadvantages of each technique are demonstrated by our data and practical advice on when and how to apply specific epitope mapping techniques during the drug development process is provided. Our results suggest chemical cross-linking most accurately identifies the epitope as defined by crystallography.
单克隆抗体在过去 30 年中已成为一类重要的治疗药物。由于治疗性抗体的作用机制与其结合表位密切相关,因此在抗体药物开发过程中,鉴定抗体对抗原的表位起着核心作用。表位作图的金标准——X 射线晶体学,需要高度的熟练程度,而且不能保证成功。在这里,我们评估了六种广泛使用的替代方法(肽阵列、丙氨酸扫描、结构域交换、氢氘交换、化学交联和羟基自由基足迹法)在五种抗体-抗原结合物(pembrolizumab+PD1、nivolumab+PD1、ipilimumab+CTLA4、tremelimumab+CTLA4 和 MK-5890+CD27)中的应用。我们的数据展示了每种技术的优缺点,并就何时以及如何在药物开发过程中应用特定的表位作图技术提供了实用建议。我们的结果表明,化学交联最能准确地确定晶体学定义的表位。