• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单中心神经血管中心颈动脉支架置入术的长期结果:长达 12 年的回顾性分析,重点关注合并症的影响。

Long-term outcomes of carotid stenting in a single neurovascular center: up to 12-year retrospective analysis with a focus on the influence of comorbidities.

机构信息

Neuroradiologische Klinik, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.

Diagnostische Und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2024 Jan;66(1):117-127. doi: 10.1007/s00234-023-03248-0. Epub 2023 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00234-023-03248-0
PMID:38010404
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes in patients who underwent carotid artery stenting (CAS) for symptomatic or asymptomatic high-grade stenosis.

METHODS

A total of 1158 patients (asymptomatic, n = 636; symptomatic, n = 522) underwent CAS at our center between 2009 and 2020. A total of 560 patients or contacts (asymptomatic, n = 316; symptomatic, n = 244) were interviewed by telephone to evaluate long-term outcomes with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Mortality from all causes, myocardial infarction, and stroke, as well as comorbidities influencing their occurrence, including overall survival and stroke-free survival, were examined.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate for all-cause mortality was 91.6% at 1 year, 77.1% at 5 years, and 55.7% at 10 years. A total of 39 (6.9%) patients had an ischemic stroke during long-term follow-up. The stroke-free survival rates at 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years were 97.9%, 92.7%, and 86.6%, respectively. Stroke-free survival and overall survival did not differ significantly between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups (overall survival, p = 0.304; stroke-free survival, p = 0.336). Regular physical activity reduced the risk of stroke and death and was associated with better long-term clinical outcomes. Age at treatment and diabetes mellitus were statistically significantly associated with death during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Long-term follow-up data confirmed the effectiveness and durability of CAS as a therapy option for both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. In patient selection for CAS, special consideration should be paid to patient age, ability to engage in physical activity, and diabetes mellitus.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估接受颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)治疗症状性或无症状性重度狭窄患者的长期预后。

方法

2009 年至 2020 年期间,我们中心共对 1158 例患者(无症状性,n=636;症状性,n=522)进行了 CAS。通过电话对 560 例患者或其联系人(无症状性,n=316;症状性,n=244)进行了随访,以评估 5 年的长期预后。研究了全因死亡率、心肌梗死和卒中,以及影响其发生的合并症,包括总生存率和无卒中生存率。

结果

全因死亡率的 1 年总体生存率为 91.6%,5 年生存率为 77.1%,10 年生存率为 55.7%。共有 39 例(6.9%)患者在长期随访期间发生缺血性卒中。1 年、5 年和 10 年的无卒中生存率分别为 97.9%、92.7%和 86.6%。症状性和无症状性患者之间的无卒中生存率和总体生存率无显著差异(总体生存率,p=0.304;无卒中生存率,p=0.336)。定期进行体育活动可降低卒中及死亡风险,与长期临床结局较好相关。治疗时的年龄和糖尿病与随访期间的死亡相关。

结论

长期随访数据证实了 CAS 作为治疗症状性和无症状性患者的有效且持久的治疗选择。在 CAS 的患者选择中,应特别注意患者年龄、进行体育活动的能力和糖尿病。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes of carotid stenting in a single neurovascular center: up to 12-year retrospective analysis with a focus on the influence of comorbidities.单中心神经血管中心颈动脉支架置入术的长期结果:长达 12 年的回顾性分析,重点关注合并症的影响。
Neuroradiology. 2024 Jan;66(1):117-127. doi: 10.1007/s00234-023-03248-0. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
Remote pre-procedural ischemic stroke as the greatest risk in carotid‑stenting‑associated stroke and death: a single center's experience.远程术前缺血性卒中是颈动脉支架置入相关卒中和死亡的最大风险:单中心经验
Int Angiol. 2017 Aug;36(4):306-315. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.16.03737-8. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
3
Carotid angioplasty with stenting versus endarterectomy: 10-year randomized trial in a community hospital.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较:社区医院的 10 年随机试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(2):163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.010.
4
Treatment of significant carotid artery stenosis in 1824 patients.1824例严重颈动脉狭窄的治疗
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Feb;56(1):107-18. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
5
Long-Term Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting When Performed by a Single Vascular Surgeon.由单一血管外科医生实施颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术的长期结果。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2019 Apr;53(3):216-223. doi: 10.1177/1538574418823379. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
6
Assessment of long-term survival and stroke after carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in patients older than 80 years.80 岁以上患者颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术后的长期生存和卒中评估。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Aug;70(2):522-529. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.121. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
7
Dual- vs single-layer stents for endovascular treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis.双层与单层支架用于有症状和无症状颈内动脉狭窄的血管内治疗
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Dec;57:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.06.016. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
8
Durability of Stroke Prevention with Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Stenting.颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术预防卒中的耐久性。
Surgery. 2018 Dec;164(6):1271-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.06.041. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
9
Carotid revascularization using endarterectomy or stenting systems (CaRESS): 4-year outcomes.使用颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入系统进行颈动脉血运重建(CaRESS):4年随访结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Aug;16(4):397-409. doi: 10.1583/08-2685.1.
10
Propensity score-matched analysis of 1-year outcomes of transcarotid revascularization with dynamic flow reversal, carotid endarterectomy, and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.经颈动脉血管重建术(动态血流逆转)、颈动脉内膜切除术和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术1年结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):213-222.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.242. Epub 2021 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Performance and Safety of the Self-Expandable Carotid Stent MER: 5-Year Outcomes from the OCEANUS Study, with Subgroup Analysis Based on Predilatation Before Carotid Artery Stenting.自膨式颈动脉支架MER的长期性能和安全性:来自OCEANUS研究的5年结果,并基于颈动脉支架置入术前预扩张进行亚组分析。
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 18;14(8):2814. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082814.

本文引用的文献

1
Usefulness of sectional images in dural AVF for the interpretation of venous anatomy.断层图像在硬脑膜动静脉瘘中对静脉解剖结构解读的实用性。
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2024 Jun;26(2):119-129. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2023.E2022.10.001. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
2
Carotid endarterectomy or stenting or best medical treatment alone for moderate-to-severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: 5-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术或最佳药物治疗单独用于中重度无症状颈动脉狭窄:一项多中心、随机对照试验的 5 年结果。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Oct;21(10):877-888. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00290-3.
3
Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Stenosis: In-Hospital Clinical Outcomes at a Single Neurovascular Center.
有症状和无症状狭窄患者的颈动脉支架置入术:单一神经血管中心的院内临床结果
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 7;11(8):2086. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082086.
4
Long-Term Mortality After Carotid Stenting.颈动脉支架置入术后的长期死亡率。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;141:e589-e599. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.264. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
5
Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience.颈动脉支架置入术的长期疗效:单中心经验。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2020 Mar 15;60(3):121-125. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0192. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Long-term outcomes of stenting and endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned pooled analysis of individual patient data.症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入术和内膜切除术的长期结果:一项个体化患者数据的预先计划的合并分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Apr;18(4):348-356. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30028-6. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
7
Long-Term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting in Clinical Practice.临床实践中颈动脉支架置入术的长期预后
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003940.
8
Differential outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与血管外科医生实施的颈动脉支架置入术的疗效差异:颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
9
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.颈动脉狭窄的血管内支架成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Epub 2010 May 26.
10
Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial.症状性重度颈动脉狭窄患者内膜切除术与血管成形术对比研究(EVA-3S)试验:一项随机多中心试验的4年随访结果
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):885-92. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70195-9. Epub 2008 Sep 5.