Suppr超能文献

皮下植入式心律转复除颤器联合心脏植入式电子装置患者的不适当电击发生率:一项单中心队列研究。

Inappropriate shock incidence in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with concomitant cardiac implantable electronic devices: A single-center cohort study.

作者信息

Okazaki Makiko, Sahashi Yuki, Nagase Takahiko, Inoue Kanki, Sekiguchi Yukio, Nitta Junichi, Shinoda Satoru, Shimizu Sayuri, Kuroki Makoto, Isobe Mitsuaki, Mihara Takahiro

机构信息

Department of Clinical Engineering, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Health Data Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Data Science, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Jan;47(1):131-138. doi: 10.1111/pace.14887. Epub 2023 Nov 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) are occasionally used in combination with other cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, whether the incidence of inappropriate shock increases in patients with S-ICDs and concomitant CIEDs remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between the concomitant use of CIEDs and the incidence of inappropriate shock in patients with current-generation S-ICDs.

METHODS

A total of 127 consecutive patients received an S-ICD. Patients were assigned to two groups depending on concomitant use of CIEDs at the time of S-ICD implantation: patients without other CIEDs (non-combined group, 106 patients) and patients with other CIEDs (combined group, 21 patients). CIEDs included pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers, and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. The primary outcome was inappropriate shock, defined as a shock other than ventricular arrhythmia. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a time-varying Cox proportional hazards model which was adjusted for age because age differed between the groups and could be a confounder.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up period of 2.2 years (interquartile range, 1.0-3.4 years), inappropriate shock events occurred in 17 (16%) and five (19%) patients of the non-combined and combined groups, respectively. While the age-adjusted hazard ratio for inappropriate shock was 24% higher in the combined than in the non-combined group (hazard ratio = 1.24, 95% confidence interval, 0.39-3.97), this difference was insignificant (p = .71).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of inappropriate shock did not differ between patients with and without concomitant use of CIEDs, suggesting that S-ICDs could potentially be combined with other CIEDs without increasing the number of inappropriate shocks. Further studies are warranted to confirm the safety and feasibility of concomitant use of S-ICDs and CIEDs.

摘要

背景

皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)偶尔会与其他心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)联合使用。然而,S-ICD与合并CIED的患者中不适当电击的发生率是否增加仍不清楚。本研究旨在调查CIED的联合使用与当代S-ICD患者不适当电击发生率之间的关联。

方法

共有127例连续患者接受了S-ICD植入。根据S-ICD植入时是否合并使用CIED将患者分为两组:无其他CIED的患者(非联合组,106例)和有其他CIED的患者(联合组,21例)。CIED包括起搏器、植入式心律转复除颤器、心脏再同步治疗起搏器和心脏再同步治疗除颤器。主要结局为不适当电击,定义为除室性心律失常以外的电击。使用随时间变化的Cox比例风险模型计算风险比和95%置信区间,并对年龄进行了调整,因为两组之间年龄不同,年龄可能是一个混杂因素。

结果

在中位随访期2.2年(四分位间距,1.0 - 3.4年)内,非联合组和联合组分别有17例(16%)和5例(19%)患者发生了不适当电击事件。虽然联合组中经年龄调整的不适当电击风险比高于非联合组24%(风险比 = 1.24,95%置信区间,0.39 - 3.97),但这种差异无统计学意义(p = 0.71)。

结论

合并使用CIED与未合并使用CIED的患者中,不适当电击的发生率没有差异,这表明S-ICD有可能与其他CIED联合使用而不增加不适当电击的次数。需要进一步的研究来证实S-ICD与CIED联合使用的安全性和可行性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验