文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

[颈椎融合术采用腓骨自体移植与钛笼移植的比较]

[Comparison of cervical fusion with autografting of fibula vs titanium cage].

作者信息

Franco-Ramírez Gerardo de Jesús, Cabrales-García Francisco, Godínez-García Francisco

机构信息

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional del Bajío, Hospital de Especialidades No. 1, Servicio de Traumatología y Ortopedia. León, Guanajuato, México.

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional del Bajío, Hospital de Especialidades No. 1, Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. León, Guanajuato, México.

出版信息

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Sep 18;61(Suppl 2):S193-S199.


DOI:
PMID:38011687
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10773913/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the gold standard in the treatment of cervical compression pathology and the titanium cage for fusion represents the most used procedure at an institutional level. A technique using fibular autograft has been described, with good results, lower morbidity and lower cost. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of fusion, subsidence and functional clinical results after discectomy with titanium cage and fibular autograft. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A clinical trial with follow-up at 3 and 6 months was carried out in patients diagnosed with cervical spondylosis, candidates for ACDF. 2 groups were formed: fibular autograft and titanium cage. Pre and post functional evaluation using the cervical disability score was made, as well as radiographic fusion and subsidence evaluation. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test, t-test and ANOVA were obtained, establishing p < 0.05. RESULTS: A sample of 20 patients with an average age of 56 years was obtained, finding a fusion rate of 90% for fibular autograft and 30% for titanium (p = 0.02) at 3 months. 10% of patients with fibular autograft presented subsidence and 70% with titanium cage at 3 and 6 months (p = 0.02). In the functional results was not found difference between both procedures (p = 0.874). CONCLUSIONS: The use of autologous fibular graft offers a better rate of fusion and subsidence compared to the titanium cage, as well as similar functional results at 3 months of follow-up. It represents an excellent treatment option for cervical spondylosis.

摘要

背景:颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)是治疗颈椎压迫性病变的金标准,在机构层面,用于融合的钛笼是最常用的手术方式。一种使用腓骨自体移植的技术已被描述,其效果良好,发病率较低且成本较低。 目的:比较椎间盘切除术后使用钛笼和腓骨自体移植的融合率、下沉率及功能临床结果。 材料与方法:对诊断为颈椎病且适合进行ACDF的患者进行了一项随访3个月和6个月的临床试验。分为两组:腓骨自体移植组和钛笼组。使用颈椎功能障碍评分进行术前和术后功能评估,以及影像学融合和下沉评估。获得描述性统计、Fisher精确检验、t检验和方差分析结果,设定p < 0.05。 结果:获得了20例平均年龄为56岁的患者样本,发现3个月时腓骨自体移植的融合率为90%,钛笼的融合率为30%(p = 0.02)。3个月时,10%的腓骨自体移植患者出现下沉,3个月和6个月时,70%的钛笼患者出现下沉(p = 0.02)。在功能结果方面,两种手术方式之间未发现差异(p = 0.874)。 结论:与钛笼相比,使用自体腓骨移植在融合率和下沉率方面表现更好,且在随访3个月时功能结果相似。它是颈椎病的一种优秀治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81aa/10773913/99912429d6d9/04435117-61-Suppl2-S193-c003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81aa/10773913/8ede3e3510d0/04435117-61-Suppl2-S193-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81aa/10773913/2388076b45d0/04435117-61-Suppl2-S193-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81aa/10773913/ce01fa5c940e/04435117-61-Suppl2-S193-c001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81aa/10773913/769f3034f574/04435117-61-Suppl2-S193-c002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81aa/10773913/99912429d6d9/04435117-61-Suppl2-S193-c003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81aa/10773913/8ede3e3510d0/04435117-61-Suppl2-S193-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81aa/10773913/2388076b45d0/04435117-61-Suppl2-S193-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81aa/10773913/ce01fa5c940e/04435117-61-Suppl2-S193-c001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81aa/10773913/769f3034f574/04435117-61-Suppl2-S193-c002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81aa/10773913/99912429d6d9/04435117-61-Suppl2-S193-c003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
[Comparison of cervical fusion with autografting of fibula vs titanium cage].

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023-9-18

[2]
A minimum 2-year comparative study of autologous cancellous bone grafting versus beta-tricalcium phosphate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a rectangular titanium stand-alone cage.

Neurosurg Rev. 2016-7

[3]
Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up.

Eur Spine J. 2009-5

[4]
Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.

Spine J. 2009-10-21

[5]
Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study.

Eur Spine J. 2011-12-29

[6]
Outcomes of interbody fusion cages used in 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: titanium cages versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010-7

[7]
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograft.

Spine J. 2004

[8]
Preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking standalone cages.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2021-2-8

[9]
Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.

Orthop Surg. 2023-11

[10]
Partial Vertebrae Resection Laterally to Harvest Supplemental Autograft Bone for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Technical Note and Outcomes.

World Neurosurg. 2019-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Does Graft Position Affect Subsidence After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

Global Spine J. 2022-5

[2]
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical myelopathy using stand-alone tricortical iliac crest autograft: Predictive factors for neurological and fusion outcomes.

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019

[3]
Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With a Stand-Alone Interbody Cage Versus a Conventional Cage-Plate Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Global Spine J. 2019-6

[4]
Entrapment Neuropathies of the Upper Extremity.

Med Clin North Am. 2019-3

[5]
Comparison of radiological outcomes and complications between single-level and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage-plate fusion system.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019-2

[6]
Comparative study between Plate-Graff, Plate-Cage and peek cage in cervical spine fusion.

Acta Ortop Mex. 2018

[7]
Current strategies for treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration: substitution and regeneration possibilities.

Biomater Res. 2017-10-23

[8]
ACDF Graft Selection by Surgeons: Survey of AOSpine Members.

Global Spine J. 2017-8

[9]
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Outcomes over 10 Years: A Prospective Study.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018-2-1

[10]
Comparison of allograft and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage subsidence rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

J Clin Neurosci. 2017-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索