Franco-Ramírez Gerardo de Jesús, Cabrales-García Francisco, Godínez-García Francisco
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional del Bajío, Hospital de Especialidades No. 1, Servicio de Traumatología y Ortopedia. León, Guanajuato, México.
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional del Bajío, Hospital de Especialidades No. 1, Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. León, Guanajuato, México.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Sep 18;61(Suppl 2):S193-S199.
BACKGROUND: The anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the gold standard in the treatment of cervical compression pathology and the titanium cage for fusion represents the most used procedure at an institutional level. A technique using fibular autograft has been described, with good results, lower morbidity and lower cost. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of fusion, subsidence and functional clinical results after discectomy with titanium cage and fibular autograft. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A clinical trial with follow-up at 3 and 6 months was carried out in patients diagnosed with cervical spondylosis, candidates for ACDF. 2 groups were formed: fibular autograft and titanium cage. Pre and post functional evaluation using the cervical disability score was made, as well as radiographic fusion and subsidence evaluation. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test, t-test and ANOVA were obtained, establishing p < 0.05. RESULTS: A sample of 20 patients with an average age of 56 years was obtained, finding a fusion rate of 90% for fibular autograft and 30% for titanium (p = 0.02) at 3 months. 10% of patients with fibular autograft presented subsidence and 70% with titanium cage at 3 and 6 months (p = 0.02). In the functional results was not found difference between both procedures (p = 0.874). CONCLUSIONS: The use of autologous fibular graft offers a better rate of fusion and subsidence compared to the titanium cage, as well as similar functional results at 3 months of follow-up. It represents an excellent treatment option for cervical spondylosis.
背景:颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)是治疗颈椎压迫性病变的金标准,在机构层面,用于融合的钛笼是最常用的手术方式。一种使用腓骨自体移植的技术已被描述,其效果良好,发病率较低且成本较低。 目的:比较椎间盘切除术后使用钛笼和腓骨自体移植的融合率、下沉率及功能临床结果。 材料与方法:对诊断为颈椎病且适合进行ACDF的患者进行了一项随访3个月和6个月的临床试验。分为两组:腓骨自体移植组和钛笼组。使用颈椎功能障碍评分进行术前和术后功能评估,以及影像学融合和下沉评估。获得描述性统计、Fisher精确检验、t检验和方差分析结果,设定p < 0.05。 结果:获得了20例平均年龄为56岁的患者样本,发现3个月时腓骨自体移植的融合率为90%,钛笼的融合率为30%(p = 0.02)。3个月时,10%的腓骨自体移植患者出现下沉,3个月和6个月时,70%的钛笼患者出现下沉(p = 0.02)。在功能结果方面,两种手术方式之间未发现差异(p = 0.874)。 结论:与钛笼相比,使用自体腓骨移植在融合率和下沉率方面表现更好,且在随访3个月时功能结果相似。它是颈椎病的一种优秀治疗选择。
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023-9-18
Global Spine J. 2022-5
Med Clin North Am. 2019-3
Global Spine J. 2017-8
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018-2-1