PURPOSE

As applications increase and residency becomes more competitive, applicants and programs will be challenged by increased demands on recruitment, metric assessment, and rank determination. Studies have investigated program opinions; however, this survey sought to illuminate the process from an applicant's perspective.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was distributed to past or current surgery residents nationwide using social media and program director emails. Regression analyses were performed to assess factors correlating with percentage of programs which offered the applicant an interview.

RESULTS

There were 223 respondents who applied to an average of 61 programs (± 40) with 16 (± 11) interviews offered. Applicants believed that programs were most interested in (1) personality, (2) letter of recommendation (LOR) writers, and (3) medical school reputation. Top factors considered by applicants in ranking were resident culture, location, program reputation, and autonomy. Bivariate analysis found factors that decreased percent of interview invites to be Asian race, whereas factors that increased interview invites included age, year of match, surgery clerkship grade, medicine clerkship grade, AOA status, honor surgery rotation, gold humanism (GHHS) status, phone call for interview made, and step scores (all  < 0.05). AOA status, step scores, honor surgery rotation, year of match, and Asian race remained significant after multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

National surveys illuminate how applicants approach the application process and what programs and applicants appear to value. This information provides insight and guidance to candidates and programs as the process of matching becomes more challenging with surging application numbers, changes in testing parameters and virtual interviews.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-022-00070-9.