A comparative analysis of the Vasoactive-Inotropic Score, the Vasoactive-Ventilation-Renal Score, and the Oxygenation Index as outcome predictors in infants with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

OBJECTIVES

To date, different severity scores and indices are available to predict outcome in infants with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). The Oxygenation Index (OI) and the Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS) has already been evaluated in the CDH population. The Vasoactive-Ventilation-Renal (VVR) Score was recently evaluated as new severity score in several studies on infants with need for cardiac surgery. The score was shown to outperform the VIS and OI as outcome predictors in these infants, but no data are available regarding the evaluation of the VVR Score in CDH infants.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center analysis at the University Children's Hospital, Bonn, Germany, during the study period from January 2019 until December 2022. Of 108 CDH infants treated at our institution, a final cohort of 100 neonates met the inclusion criteria.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

diagnosis of CDH (right-sided, left-sided, or bilateral).

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

early mortality (before surgical correction of the diaphragm), palliative care after birth, no available data for OI, VIS, and VVR Score calculation. The OI, the VIS, and the VVR Score were calculated at three selected timepoints: at 48-72 h after birth (T1), before surgery (T2), and after surgery (T3).

MAIN RESULTS

The primary clinical endpoint (in-hospital mortality) was reached in 21% of the infants. Infants surviving to discharge were allocated to group A, infants with fatal outcome to group B. In the univariate analysis, the OI was significantly higher in infants allocated to group B at T2 (p < .001), and T3 (p < .001). The VIS was significantly higher only at T1 in infants allocated to group B (p = .001). The VVR Score was significantly higher at T1 (p = .017), and at T3 (p = .002) in infants not surviving to discharge. In the multivariate analysis, the OI at T2 + T3 (p < .001), the VIS at T1 (p = .048), and the VVR Score at T1 + T3 (p = .023, and p = .048, respectively) remained significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. The OI presented the highest area under the curve (AUC) at T2 and T3 (T2:0.867, p = .001; T3:0.833, p = .000) regarding the primary endpoint in the overall cohort. In the subgroup of infants without need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy (n = 60) the VVR Sore presented the best performance with an AUC of 0.942 (p = .000) at T3.

CONCLUSION

The severity scores OI, VIS, and VVR-Score are independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in CDH infants. The OI seems to outperform the VIS and VVR-Score as outcome predictor immediately before and after CDH surgery, whereas the VVR Score presented the best performance in the subgroup of CDH infants without need for ECMO and mild-to-moderate CDH defects.