Soltysik S, Byron C M, Einarsdottir G H, Stankovich M T
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987 Jan 30;911(2):201-8. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(87)90009-4.
We measured the redox potentials of frozen inactivated L-amino-acid oxidase (L-amino-acid:oxygen oxidoreductase (deaminating), EC 1.4.3.2) and inhibitor-bound (anthranilic acid) enzyme, and compared these redox properties to those of active L-amino-acid oxidase and benzoate-bound D-amino-acid oxidase (EC 1.4.3.3), respectively. The redox properties of the inactive enzyme are similar to the properties of free flavin; the potential is within 0.015 V of free flavin and no radical stabilization is seen. This corresponds to the loss of most interactions between apoprotein and flavin. In contrast, the anthranilic acid lowers the amount of radical stabilized from 85% to 35%. The potentials are still 0.150 V positive of free flavin, indicating that in the presence of inhibitor, many flavin-protein interactions remain intact. The difference between this behavior and that of D-amino-acid oxidase bound to benzoate, where the amount of radical declined from 95% to 5%, is explained on the basis of the relative tightness of binding of apoprotein to FAD. D-Amino-acid oxidase apoprotein has a relatively low Ka (10(6)) for FAD, and benzoate has a relatively high Ka (10(5)) for the enzyme. Therefore, the binding of benzoate increases the tightness of FAD binding to apo-D-amino-acid oxidase (10(11)), indicating significant changes in flavin-protein interactions. In contrast, apo-L-amino-acid oxidase binds flavin tightly (the Ka is greater than 10(7)) and the enzyme binds to anthranilate much less tightly, with a Ka of 10(3). The L-amino-acid oxidase apoprotein binding to FAD is tight initially, and the binding of anthranilate changes it only slightly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们测量了冷冻灭活的L-氨基酸氧化酶(L-氨基酸:氧氧化还原酶(脱氨基),EC 1.4.3.2)和与抑制剂结合(邻氨基苯甲酸)的酶的氧化还原电位,并分别将这些氧化还原特性与活性L-氨基酸氧化酶和与苯甲酸酯结合的D-氨基酸氧化酶(EC 1.4.3.3)的氧化还原特性进行比较。无活性酶的氧化还原特性与游离黄素的特性相似;其电位在游离黄素的0.015 V范围内,且未观察到自由基稳定化现象。这对应于脱辅基蛋白与黄素之间大多数相互作用的丧失。相比之下,邻氨基苯甲酸将稳定的自由基量从85%降低至35%。其电位仍比游离黄素正0.150 V,表明在存在抑制剂的情况下,许多黄素-蛋白质相互作用仍然完整。这种行为与与苯甲酸酯结合的D-氨基酸氧化酶的行为之间的差异(其中自由基量从95%降至5%),是根据脱辅基蛋白与FAD结合的相对紧密程度来解释的。D-氨基酸氧化酶脱辅基蛋白对FAD的解离常数(Ka)相对较低(10⁶),而苯甲酸酯对该酶的Ka相对较高(10⁵)。因此,苯甲酸酯的结合增加了FAD与脱辅基-D-氨基酸氧化酶结合的紧密程度(10¹¹),表明黄素-蛋白质相互作用发生了显著变化。相比之下,脱辅基-L-氨基酸氧化酶紧密结合黄素(Ka大于10⁷),且该酶与邻氨基苯甲酸的结合则宽松得多,Ka为10³。L-氨基酸氧化酶脱辅基蛋白最初与FAD的结合紧密,邻氨基苯甲酸的结合仅使其略有变化。(摘要截断于250字)