Department of Neurology, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 27;13(1):20920. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47408-x.
It has already been described that transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) can selectively influence nociceptive evoked potentials. This study is the first aiming to prove an influence of tsDCS on pain-related evoked potentials (PREP) using concentric surface electrodes (CE), whose nociceptive specificity is still under discussion. 28 healthy subjects participated in this sham-controlled, double-blind cross-over study. All subjects underwent one session of anodal and one session of sham low-thoracic tsDCS. Before and after the intervention, PREP using CE, PREP-induced pain perception and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) were assessed on the right upper and lower limb. We found a decrease in PREP amplitude at the lower limb after sham stimulation, but not after anodal tsDCS, while SEP remained unchanged under all studied conditions. There was no difference between the effects of anodal tsDCS and sham stimulation on the studied parameters assessed at the upper limb. PREP-induced pain of the upper and lower limb increased after anodal tsDCS. The ability of influencing PREP using a CE at the spinal level in contrast to SEP suggests that PREP using CE follows the spinothalamic pathway and supports the assumption that it is specifically nociceptive. However, while mainly inhibitory effects on nociceptive stimuli have already been described, our results rather suggest that anodal tsDCS has a sensitizing effect. This may indicate that the mechanisms underlying the elicitation of PREP with CE are not the same as for the other nociceptive evoked potentials. The effects on the processing of different types of painful stimuli should be directly compared in future studies.
已经描述过经皮脊髓直流电刺激(tsDCS)可以选择性地影响伤害性诱发电位。本研究旨在首次使用同心表面电极(CE)证明 tsDCS 对疼痛相关诱发电位(PREP)的影响,而 CE 的伤害性特异性仍在讨论中。28 名健康受试者参与了这项假刺激对照、双盲交叉研究。所有受试者均接受了一次阳极和一次假低胸 tsDCS 治疗。干预前后,使用 CE 评估 PREP、PREP 诱发的疼痛感知和体感诱发电位(SEP)在上肢和下肢。我们发现,假刺激后下肢 PREP 幅度降低,但阳极 tsDCS 后 PREP 幅度没有降低,而在所有研究条件下 SEP 保持不变。在上肢,阳极 tsDCS 和假刺激对研究参数的影响没有差异。阳极 tsDCS 后上肢和下肢 PREP 诱发的疼痛增加。与 SEP 相比,使用 CE 在脊髓水平影响 PREP 的能力表明,使用 CE 的 PREP 遵循脊髓丘脑通路,并支持其是特异性伤害性的假设。然而,虽然已经描述了主要的抑制性影响对伤害性刺激,我们的结果表明,阳极 tsDCS 具有致敏作用。这可能表明,使用 CE 诱发 PREP 的机制与其他伤害性诱发电位的机制不同。在未来的研究中,应直接比较不同类型疼痛刺激的处理效果。