Leff P, Martin G R, Morse J M
Br J Pharmacol. 1986 Nov;89(3):493-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1986.tb11149.x.
In a previous study, we attempted to verify the classification of 5-hydroxytryptamine2 (5-HT2) receptors in three vascular tissues, by use of the conventional antagonists, ketanserin, spiperone, methysergide and trazodone. However, it was not possible to conclude homogeneity of the receptor type in the three tissues due to the inconsistent behaviour of these antagonists, in particular, their apparently variable affinities between the tissues. These results led to the reliability of the conventional antagonists being questioned as receptor probes. In the present study, a set of tryptamine analogues were investigated in two of the tissues, the rabbit aorta and the rat jugular vein. Unlike the conventional antagonists, these compounds bear a close chemical relation to the natural agonist, 5-HT. In both tissues, alpha, alpha-dimethyltryptamine demonstrated apparently simple competitive antagonism of 5-HT-induced constrictions. Its affinity was estimated to be the same in each case. The affinities and relative efficacies of 5-HT, 5-cyanotryptamine, N,N-dimethyltryptamine and N-benzyl-5-methoxytryptamine were also found to be indistinguishable between the two tissues. Unlike the conventional 5-HT2 receptor antagonists, these tryptamine analogues failed to distinguish between the 5-HT receptors in the rabbit aorta and rat jugular vein implying that they truly belong to the same class. In view of this result, it is suggested that simple tryptamine analogues are more reliable probes for 5-HT receptor classification than ligands which bear little or no chemical relation to the natural agonist.
在之前的一项研究中,我们试图通过使用传统拮抗剂酮色林、螺哌隆、麦角新碱和曲唑酮来验证三种血管组织中5-羟色胺2(5-HT2)受体的分类。然而,由于这些拮抗剂的行为不一致,特别是它们在不同组织间的亲和力明显不同,因此无法得出这三种组织中受体类型的同质性结论。这些结果使得传统拮抗剂作为受体探针的可靠性受到质疑。在本研究中,我们在其中两种组织,即兔主动脉和大鼠颈静脉中研究了一组色胺类似物。与传统拮抗剂不同,这些化合物与天然激动剂5-羟色胺有密切的化学关系。在这两种组织中,α,α-二甲基色胺对5-羟色胺诱导的收缩均表现出明显的简单竞争性拮抗作用。估计其在每种情况下的亲和力相同。还发现5-羟色胺、5-氰基色胺、N,N-二甲基色胺和N-苄基-5-甲氧基色胺在这两种组织中的亲和力和相对效能没有差异。与传统的5-HT2受体拮抗剂不同,这些色胺类似物无法区分兔主动脉和大鼠颈静脉中的5-羟色胺受体,这意味着它们确实属于同一类。鉴于这一结果,有人提出,对于5-羟色胺受体分类而言,简单的色胺类似物比与天然激动剂几乎没有或完全没有化学关系的配体是更可靠的探针。