Cuttino J T, Yankaskas B C, Hoskins E O
Br J Radiol. 1986 Dec;59(708):1159-62. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-59-708-1159.
There are two common methods of obtaining high-quality screening mammography: screen-film mammography (more simply, mammography) using a dedicated unit, and xeromammography. We studied the accuracy of the two techniques in detecting breast cancer by a retrospective study, analysing accuracy of interpretation in cases where both mammography and xeromammography were performed. Seventy-six patients were considered with 86 biopsies and mammograms resulting in detection of 32 cancers and 54 benign lesions. There was no difference in accuracy of interpretation between mammography and xeromammography. The sensitivities were: mammography 0.91, xeromammography 0.88. The specificities were: mammography 0.63, xeromammography 0.75. We conclude that both modalities are comparable in detecting cancer when optimal technique and experienced personnel are used.
使用专用设备的屏-片乳腺摄影（更简单地说，钼靶摄影）和干板乳腺摄影。我们通过一项回顾性研究，分析了在同时进行钼靶摄影和干板乳腺摄影的病例中两种技术在检测乳腺癌方面的准确性。研究了76例患者，共进行了86次活检和钼靶检查，检测出32例癌症和54例良性病变。钼靶摄影和干板乳腺摄影在解读准确性方面没有差异。敏感度分别为：钼靶摄影0.91，干板乳腺摄影0.88。特异度分别为：钼靶摄影0.63，干板乳腺摄影0.75。我们得出结论，当采用最佳技术和经验丰富的人员时，两种方法在检测癌症方面具有可比性。
