Department of Ultrasound, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan-Dec;22:15330338231183585. doi: 10.1177/15330338231183585.
Previous studies have failed to investigate the specific effects of advanced age on survival outcomes by considering the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and age permutation in patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma (T1a RCC) treated by microwave ablation (MWA). Notably, RCC guidelines recommended radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and active surveillance (AS) are both treatment options for elderly T1a RCC, but whether MWA is superior to AS in light of higher heating efficiency and larger ablation zone compared with RFA is not clear. This study aimed to investigate the specific effects of advanced age on survival outcomes of T1a RCC patients stratified by CCI score and indicate better intervention for elderly T1a RCC between MWA and AS.
This was a retrospective study. We retrospectively reviewed 237 patients with T1a RCC who had undergone MWA over the last 16 years. Data were analyzed by Cox regression and Landmark analysis. Interaction tests and propensity score matching were used to account for potential biases. We compared the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates of patients ≥75 years in our study with corresponding figures from 4251 counterparts undergoing AS in published articles.
Using patients <75 years with a CCI ≤2 as a reference, the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of OS for patients<75 years with a CCI ≥3, patients ≥75 years with a CCI ≤2, and patients ≥75 years with CCI ≥3, were 2.954 (1.139-7.663), 3.48 (1.487-8.146), and 3.357 (1.162-9.698), respectively. The adverse effect of an age ≥75 years on OS was attenuated in patients with a CCI ≥3. The attenuation lasted for 62.5 months of follow-up ( = .017). Notably, advanced age exerted a protective effect on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with a CCI ≥3, increasing the 8-year PFS from 67.8% to 100% ( = .049). Relative to 1-, 3-, 5-, and 8-year survival data for patients aged ≥75 undergoing AS, the OS rates for 5-year follow-up were always better in MWA. However, beyond 5 years, the OS rates dropped to levels that were similar to AS.
Advanced age exerts adverse effects and significantly protective effects on OS and PFS, respectively, in T1a RCC patients with a CCI ≥ 3. According to our study, elderly patients with T1a RCC underwent radical MWA may yield a better medium-term OS relative to AS.
先前的研究未能考虑 Charlson 合并症指数 (CCI) 和年龄置换,来探讨高龄对 T1a 肾细胞癌 (T1a RCC) 患者生存结局的具体影响。值得注意的是,RCC 指南建议射频消融 (RFA) 和主动监测 (AS) 都是老年 T1a RCC 的治疗选择,但与 RFA 相比,MWA 的加热效率更高,消融区域更大,是否更优尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨 CCI 评分分层的 T1a RCC 患者中高龄对生存结局的具体影响,并指出 MWA 与 AS 之间对老年 T1a RCC 的更好干预措施。
这是一项回顾性研究。我们回顾性分析了过去 16 年中接受 MWA 治疗的 237 例 T1a RCC 患者的数据。采用 Cox 回归和 Landmark 分析进行数据分析。交互检验和倾向评分匹配用于纠正潜在的偏倚。我们将本研究中≥75 岁患者的总生存 (OS) 和癌症特异性生存 (CSS) 率与发表文章中 4251 例接受 AS 治疗的患者的相应数据进行了比较。
以<75 岁且 CCI≤2 的患者为参考,<75 岁且 CCI≥3、≥75 岁且 CCI≤2 和≥75 岁且 CCI≥3 的患者 OS 的风险比 (HR) 和 95%置信区间 (CI) 分别为 2.954 (1.139-7.663)、3.48 (1.487-8.146) 和 3.357 (1.162-9.698)。CCI≥3 患者中年龄≥75 岁对 OS 的不利影响减弱。这种减弱持续了 62.5 个月的随访时间 ( = .017)。值得注意的是,高龄对 CCI≥3 患者的无进展生存 (PFS) 具有保护作用,将 8 年的 PFS 从 67.8%提高到 100% ( = .049)。与≥75 岁接受 AS 的患者的 1、3、5 和 8 年生存数据相比,MWA 的 5 年 OS 率始终更好。然而,5 年后,OS 率下降到与 AS 相似的水平。
CCI≥3 的 T1a RCC 患者中,高龄对 OS 和 PFS 分别具有不良影响和显著的保护作用。根据本研究,接受根治性 MWA 的老年 T1a RCC 患者可能获得比 AS 更好的中期 OS。