• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典民用穿透性创伤性脑损伤发生率和死亡率增加:一项基于单中心登记的研究。

Increased Incidence and Mortality of Civilian Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury in Sweden: A Single-Center Registry-Based Study.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurosurgery, Neurocentre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2024 Feb;182:e493-e505. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.11.129. Epub 2023 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.11.129
PMID:38040331
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Penetrating trauma to the head and neck has increased during the past decade in Sweden. The aim of this study was to characterize these injuries and evaluate the outcomes for patients treated at a tertiary trauma center.

METHODS

Swedish trauma registry data were extracted on patients with head and neck injuries admitted to Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden) between 2011 and 2019. Outcome information was extracted from hospital records, with the primary endpoints focusing on the physiological outcome measures and the secondary endpoints on the surgical and radiological outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 1436 patients with penetrating trauma, 329 with penetrating head and neck injuries were identified. Of the 329 patients, 66 (20%) had suffered a gunshot wound (GSW), 240 (73%) a stab wound (SW), and 23 (7%) an injury from other trauma mechanisms (OTMs). The median age for the corresponding 3 groups of patients was 25, 33, and 21 years, respectively. Assault was the primary intent, with 54 patients experiencing GSWs (81.8%) and 158 SWs (65.8%). Patients with GSWs had more severe injuries, worse admission Glasgow coma scale, motor, scores, and a higher intubation rate at the injury site. Most GSW patients underwent major surgery (59.1%) as the initial procedure and were more likely to have intracranial hemorrhage (21.2%). The 30-day mortality was 45.5% (n = 30) for GSWs, 5.4% (n = 13) for SWs, and 0% (n = 0) for OTMs. There was an annual increase in the incidence and mortality for GSWs and SWs.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 2011 and 2019, an increasing annual trend was found in the incidence and mortality from penetrating head and neck trauma in Stockholm, Sweden. GSW patients experienced more severe injuries and intracranial hemorrhage and underwent more surgical interventions compared with patients with SWs and OTMs.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,瑞典头部和颈部穿透性创伤有所增加。本研究旨在对这些损伤进行特征描述,并评估在三级创伤中心接受治疗的患者的结局。

方法

从瑞典斯德哥尔摩卡罗林斯卡大学医院(Karolinska University Hospital)2011 年至 2019 年期间收治的头部和颈部损伤患者的瑞典创伤登记处数据中提取资料。从医院记录中提取结局信息,主要结局集中在生理结局指标上,次要结局集中在手术和影像学结局上。

结果

在 1436 例穿透性创伤患者中,确定了 329 例穿透性头颈部损伤患者。在这 329 例患者中,66 例(20%)为枪伤(GSW),240 例(73%)为刺伤(SW),23 例(7%)为其他创伤机制(OTM)所致损伤。相应的 3 组患者的中位年龄分别为 25、33 和 21 岁。主要受伤原因是袭击,54 例 GSW 患者(81.8%)和 158 例 SW 患者(65.8%)。GSW 患者的损伤更严重,入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分、运动评分更差,且在受伤部位插管率更高。大多数 GSW 患者最初接受了主要手术(59.1%),更有可能发生颅内出血(21.2%)。GSW 的 30 天死亡率为 45.5%(n=30),SW 为 5.4%(n=13),OTM 为 0%(n=0)。GSW 和 SW 的发生率和死亡率呈逐年上升趋势。

结论

2011 年至 2019 年期间,瑞典斯德哥尔摩穿透性头颈部创伤的发生率和死亡率呈逐年上升趋势。与 SW 和 OTM 患者相比,GSW 患者的损伤更严重,颅内出血更多,且接受了更多的手术干预。

相似文献

1
Increased Incidence and Mortality of Civilian Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury in Sweden: A Single-Center Registry-Based Study.瑞典民用穿透性创伤性脑损伤发生率和死亡率增加:一项基于单中心登记的研究。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Feb;182:e493-e505. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.11.129. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
2
A comparative audit of gunshot wounds and stab wounds to the neck in a South African metropolitan trauma service.南非一家大都市创伤服务机构中颈部枪伤和刺伤的对比审计。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Sep;98(7):488-95. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0181. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
3
High grade renal trauma: Does the mechanism of penetrating injury influence renal salvage rate?重度肾外伤:穿透伤机制会影响肾脏挽救率吗?
Injury. 2022 Jan;53(1):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.08.016. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
4
Severe penetrating trauma in Switzerland: first analysis of the Swiss Trauma Registry (STR).瑞士严重穿透性创伤:瑞士创伤登记处(STR)的首次分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3837-3846. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01822-w. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
5
Incidence, Demographics, and Outcomes of Penetrating Trauma in Sweden During the Past Decade.过去十年间瑞典穿透性创伤的发病率、人口统计学特征及治疗结果
Front Neurol. 2021 Nov 15;12:730405. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.730405. eCollection 2021.
6
Penetrating injuries in Germany - epidemiology, management and outcome an analysis based on the TraumaRegister DGU®.德国的穿透性损伤 - 基于创伤登记处 DGU®的流行病学、处理和结局分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 13;29(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00895-1.
7
CT after emergency surgery in penetrating trauma: a seven-year experience in a level I Nordic trauma center.穿透性创伤急诊手术后的CT检查:北欧一级创伤中心的七年经验
Acta Radiol. 2023 Feb;64(2):684-689. doi: 10.1177/02841851221094966. Epub 2022 May 3.
8
Nationwide trends in mortality following penetrating trauma: Are we up for the challenge?全国范围内穿透性创伤后死亡率的趋势:我们是否能应对这一挑战?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jul;85(1):160-166. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001907.
9
Laparotomy for penetrating gastric trauma - A South African experience.剖腹探查术治疗穿透性胃外伤——南非的经验。
Injury. 2022 May;53(5):1610-1614. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.023. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
10
Pediatric intracranial gunshot wounds: the Memphis experience.小儿颅内枪伤:孟菲斯的经验
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 May;17(5):595-601. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.PEDS15285. Epub 2016 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology of Traumatic brain injury in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, mechanisms, and outcomes.埃塞俄比亚创伤性脑损伤的流行病学:患病率、机制及结局的系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2025 May 30;20(5):e0322641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322641. eCollection 2025.