From the Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN.
South Med J. 2023 Dec;116(12):938-941. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001630.
Follow-up care for incidental findings (IFs) on trauma computed tomography scans is a component of comprehensive healthcare. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of our IF predischarge disclosure practice guideline and identify factors contributing to follow-up failure.
This was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational database: 615 patients with IFs from November 2019 to February 2020. Follow-up compliance was determined by electronic medical record review and/or a telephone call after a mail-out request for voluntary participation. Volunteers answered a predetermined questionnaire regarding follow-up care.
A total of 115 patients (19%) had computed tomography-based IFs recommending additional imaging or other follow-ups. Seventy-four (64%) patients were lost to inclusion as a result of death (12.1%), inability to contact (51.3%), or noninterest (5.2%). Of the remaining 36 patients, 19 received follow-up care (52.7%) and 17 did not (47.2%). No statistical differences existed among groups in age, sex, mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale score, whether informed by physicians or midlevel providers, or type of IF. A total of 15 (88%) nonfollow-up patients did not recall the disclosure or discharge paperwork instructions. Of 19 compliant patients: 9 had additional imaging only, 5 had biopsies and/or surgical intervention (n = 3 cancer, n = 2 benign), 3 had primary care advice against additional studies and 2 were referred to specialists.
Predischarge disclosure of IFs can contribute significantly to overall patient health. Nonetheless, fewer than half of patients do not pursue follow-up recommendations, most often citing failure to recall verbal/written instructions. More effective communication with attention to health literacy, follow-up telephone calls, and postdischarge appointments are potential catalysts for improved patient compliance.
对创伤 CT 扫描偶然发现(IF)进行随访是综合医疗的一个组成部分。我们的目的是评估我们的 IF 出院前披露实践指南的有效性,并确定导致随访失败的因素。
这是一项前瞻性观察数据库的二次分析:2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 2 月期间,共有 615 名 IF 患者。通过电子病历回顾和/或在邮寄自愿参与请求后的电话随访来确定随访的依从性。志愿者回答了一个关于随访护理的预定问卷。
共有 115 名(19%)患者因 CT 检查发现 IF 而需要额外的影像学检查或其他随访。由于死亡(12.1%)、无法联系(51.3%)或不感兴趣(5.2%),74 名(64%)患者无法纳入。在其余 36 名患者中,有 19 名接受了随访(52.7%),17 名未接受(47.2%)。在年龄、性别、损伤机制、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、是否由医生或中级医务人员告知、IF 类型等方面,各组之间没有统计学差异。没有接受随访的 17 名患者中,有 15 名(88%)表示不记得披露或出院文件说明。在 19 名依从性患者中:9 名仅接受了额外的影像学检查,5 名接受了活检和/或手术干预(3 例癌症,2 例良性),3 名接受了初级保健建议,避免进行额外的研究,2 名被转介给了专家。
IF 出院前披露可以显著促进患者整体健康。然而,只有不到一半的患者不遵循随访建议,最常见的原因是不记得口头/书面说明。更有效的沟通,注重健康素养、随访电话和出院后预约,可能是提高患者依从性的催化剂。