School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong 528000, China.
Centre for Environmental and Energy Research, Ghent University Global Campus, Incheon 21985, Republic of Korea; Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Ghent University, Centre for Advanced Process Technology for Urban REsource Recovery (CAPTURE), Ghent B9000, Belgium.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:169103. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169103. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
Increasing eutrophication has led to a continuous deterioration of many aquatic ecosystems. Polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) can provide insight into the human response to this challenge, as they initiate enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) through cyclical anaerobic phosphorus release and aerobic phosphorus uptake. Although the limiting environmental factors for PAO growth and phosphorus removal have been widely discussed, there remains a gap in the knowledge surrounding the differences in the type and phosphorus removal efficiencies of natural and engineered PAO systems. Furthermore, due to the limitations of PAOs in conventional wastewater treatment environments, there is an urgent need to find functional PAOs in extreme environments for better wastewater treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the effects of extreme conditions on the phosphorus removal efficiency of PAOs as well as the types, sources, and characteristics of PAOs. In this paper, we summarize the response mechanisms of PAOs, denitrifying polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (D-PAOs), aerobic denitrifying polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (AD-PAOs), and sulfur-related PAOs (S-PAOs). The mechanism of nitrogen and phosphorus removal in PAOs is related to the coupling cycles of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur. The genera of PAOs differ in natural and engineered systems, but PAOs have more diversity in aquatic environments and soils. Recent studies on the impact of several parameters (e.g., temperature, carbon source, pH, and dissolved oxygen) and extracellular polymer substances on the phosphorus removal efficiency of PAOs in natural and engineered systems are further discussed. Most of the PAOs screened under extreme conditions still had high phosphorus removal efficiencies (>80.0 %). These results provide a reference for searching for PAOs with different adaptations to achieve better wastewater treatment.
富营养化的不断加剧导致许多水生生态系统持续恶化。聚磷酸盐积累生物(PAOs)可以为人类应对这一挑战提供启示,因为它们通过周期性的厌氧磷释放和好氧磷摄取来启动增强型生物除磷(EBPR)。尽管已经广泛讨论了 PAO 生长和除磷的限制环境因素,但对于自然和工程 PAO 系统的类型和除磷效率的差异,仍存在知识空白。此外,由于 PAOs 在传统废水处理环境中的局限性,迫切需要在极端环境中寻找功能性 PAOs 以实现更好的废水处理。因此,有必要探索极端条件对 PAO 除磷效率的影响,以及 PAO 的类型、来源和特性。本文总结了 PAOs、反硝化聚磷酸盐积累生物(D-PAOs)、好氧反硝化聚磷酸盐积累生物(AD-PAOs)和硫相关 PAOs(S-PAOs)的响应机制。PAOs 中的氮磷去除机制与碳、氮、磷和硫的耦合循环有关。PAOs 的属在自然和工程系统中存在差异,但在水生环境和土壤中 PAOs 的多样性更多。最近对几种参数(如温度、碳源、pH 值和溶解氧)和胞外聚合物物质对自然和工程系统中 PAO 除磷效率的影响的研究进一步讨论。在极端条件下筛选的大多数 PAOs 仍具有较高的除磷效率(>80.0%)。这些结果为寻找具有不同适应能力的 PAOs 以实现更好的废水处理提供了参考。