Lindsey D, Christopher M, Hollenbach J, Boyd J H, Lindsey W E
J Trauma. 1987 Jan;27(1):45-8.
Human bites and common lacerations are frequent in certain residential groups in institutions for the care of developmentally disabled individuals. We screened the records of such an institution and studied the course and outcome of 434 human bite wounds and 803 lacerations in the same group of clients. Infection developed in 13.4% of the lacerations, and 17.7% of the bite wounds (chi 2 = 3.474; p greater than 0.06). Prophylactic antibiotics were administered after 14.0% of the bite wounds, and 3.2% of the lacerations. Infection supervened after prophylactic antibiotics in 29.5% of the bites and 34.6% of the lacerations. No patient with a bite wound required debridement, initial or subsequent surgical intervention other than wound closure, admission to hospital, or intravenous antibiotics. There is no recorded instance of a bite wound complication other than immediate loss of tissue. These data substantiate a higher incidence of infection in human bite wounds, but they are scant support for admonition that such wounds are indication for routine antimicrobial prophylaxis or aggressive surgical intervention.
在为发育障碍人士提供照料的机构中的某些居住群体里,人咬伤和普通撕裂伤很常见。我们筛查了这样一家机构的记录,并研究了同一组客户中434例人咬伤伤口和803例撕裂伤的病程及结果。13.4%的撕裂伤发生了感染,17.7%的咬伤伤口发生了感染(卡方检验=3.474;P>0.06)。14.0%的咬伤伤口和3.2%的撕裂伤在伤后使用了预防性抗生素。在使用预防性抗生素后,29.5%的咬伤伤口和34.6%的撕裂伤发生继发感染。除伤口缝合、住院或静脉使用抗生素外,没有一名咬伤伤口患者需要清创、初次或后续手术干预。除了即时的组织缺失外,没有关于咬伤伤口并发症的记录实例。这些数据证实了人咬伤伤口感染发生率较高,但几乎没有支持这样的告诫,即此类伤口是常规抗菌预防或积极手术干预的指征。