文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

数字不平等对美国食管癌差异的影响。

The Impact of Digital Inequities on Esophageal Cancer Disparities in the US.

作者信息

Fei-Zhang David J, Edwards Evan R, Asthana Shravan, Chelius Daniel C, Sheyn Anthony M, Rastatter Jeffrey C

机构信息

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 420 E Superior St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 22;15(23):5522. doi: 10.3390/cancers15235522.


DOI:10.3390/cancers15235522
PMID:38067225
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10705088/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is currently no comprehensive tool that quantifiably measures validated factors of modern technology access in the US for digital inequity impact on esophageal cancer care (EC). OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of digital inequities on esophageal cancer disparities while accounting for traditional social determinants. METHODS: 15,656 EC patients from 2013-2017 in SEER were assessed for significant regression trends in long-term follow-up, survival, prognosis, and treatment with increasing overall digital inequity, as measured by the Digital Inequity Index (DII). The DII was calculated based on 17 census tract-level variables derived from the American Community Survey and Federal Communications Commission. Variables were categorized as infrastructure access or sociodemographic, ranked, and then averaged into a composite score. RESULTS: With increasing overall digital inequity, significant decreases in the length of long-term follow-up ( < 0.001) and survival ( < 0.001) for EC patients were observed. EC patients showed decreased odds of receiving indicated surgical resection (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-99) with increasing digital inequity. They also showed increased odds of advanced preliminary staging (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.05) and decreased odds of receiving indicated chemotherapy (OR 0.97;95% CI 0.95-99). CONCLUSIONS: Digital inequities meaningfully contribute to detrimental trends in EC patient care in the US, allowing discourse for targeted means of alleviating disparities while contextualizing national, sociodemographic trends of the impact of online access on informed care.

摘要

背景:目前尚无全面的工具可量化衡量美国现代技术获取的经过验证的因素对食管癌护理(EC)中数字不平等的影响。 目的:在考虑传统社会决定因素的同时,评估数字不平等对食管癌差异的影响。 方法:对2013年至2017年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)项目中的15656例食管癌患者进行评估,以数字不平等指数(DII)衡量总体数字不平等增加时,其长期随访、生存、预后和治疗方面的显著回归趋势。DII基于从美国社区调查和联邦通信委员会得出的17个人口普查区层面的变量计算得出。变量被分类为基础设施获取或社会人口统计学变量,进行排名,然后平均为一个综合分数。 结果:随着总体数字不平等的增加,观察到食管癌患者的长期随访时间(<0.001)和生存率(<0.001)显著下降。随着数字不平等的增加,食管癌患者接受指定手术切除的几率降低(比值比[OR]0.97,95%置信区间[CI]0.95 - 99)。他们出现晚期初步分期的几率也增加(OR 1.02,95% CI 1.00 - 1.05),而接受指定化疗的几率降低(OR 0.97;95% CI 0.95 - 99)。 结论:数字不平等对美国食管癌患者护理中的有害趋势有显著影响,这为讨论有针对性的减轻差异的方法提供了依据,同时将在线获取对明智护理影响的国家、社会人口统计学趋势纳入背景考量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3077/10705088/5f2bd06607fa/cancers-15-05522-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3077/10705088/0c8f9d77160b/cancers-15-05522-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3077/10705088/40ff31b76fe8/cancers-15-05522-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3077/10705088/5f2bd06607fa/cancers-15-05522-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3077/10705088/0c8f9d77160b/cancers-15-05522-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3077/10705088/40ff31b76fe8/cancers-15-05522-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3077/10705088/5f2bd06607fa/cancers-15-05522-g003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
The Impact of Digital Inequities on Esophageal Cancer Disparities in the US.

Cancers (Basel). 2023-11-22

[2]
The impact of digital inequities on laryngeal cancer disparities in the US.

Am J Otolaryngol. 2024

[3]
The impact of digital inequities on gastrointestinal cancer disparities in the United States.

J Surg Oncol. 2023-7

[4]
The impact of digital inequities on salivary gland cancer disparities in the United States.

Head Neck. 2025-2

[5]
Internet Access, Social Risk Factors, and Web-Based Social Support Seeking Behavior: Assessing Correlates of the "Digital Divide" Across Neighborhoods in The State of Maryland.

J Med Syst. 2021-9-19

[6]
Inequities in Technology Access and Digital Health Literacy Among Patients With Dermatologic Conditions: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey.

JMIR Dermatol. 2024-3-22

[7]
A Socio-Ecological Approach to Addressing Digital Redlining in the United States: A Call to Action for Health Equity.

Front Digit Health. 2022-7-18

[8]
Quantifying the Digital Divide: Associations of Broadband Internet with Tele-mental Health Access Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

J Gen Intern Med. 2023-7

[9]
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Internet Use and the Use of Digital Health Tools: Secondary Analysis of the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey.

J Med Internet Res. 2022-9-19

[10]
Racial Disparities, Outcomes, and Surgical Utilization among Hispanics with Esophageal Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Database Analysis.

Oncology. 2019-5-20

引用本文的文献

[1]
Satisfaction With Internet Access, Cancer Information-Seeking, and Digital Health Technology: Cross-Sectional Survey Assessment.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-8-27

[2]
The Impact of Digital Inequities on Oropharyngeal Cancer Disparities in the United States.

OTO Open. 2025-4-9

[3]
Multilevel Disparities of Sex-Differentiated Human Papilloma Virus-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancers in the United States.

J Clin Med. 2024-10-25

[4]
The impact of digital inequities on salivary gland cancer disparities in the United States.

Head Neck. 2025-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
The impact of digital inequities on laryngeal cancer disparities in the US.

Am J Otolaryngol. 2024

[2]
Large-data contextualizations of social determinant associations in pediatric head and neck cancers.

Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023-12-1

[3]
Association of Minority-Serving Hospital Status with Post-Discharge Care Utilization and Expenditures in Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2023-11

[4]
Analyzing County-level Social Vulnerabilities of Head and Neck Melanomas in the United States.

Laryngoscope. 2024-1

[5]
Assessment of Social Vulnerability in Pediatric Head and Neck Cancer Care and Prognosis in the United States.

JAMA Netw Open. 2023-2-1

[6]
The association of upward economic mobility with textbook outcomes among patients undergoing general and cardiovascular surgery.

Am J Surg. 2023-3

[7]
Preface: Experiencing Cancer in Appalachian Kentucky.

J Appalach Health. 2020-7-19

[8]
The Landscape of Connected Cancer Symptom Management in Rural America: A Narrative Review of Opportunities for Launching Connected Health Interventions.

J Appalach Health. 2020-11-17

[9]
Barn-Raising on the Digital Frontier: The L.A.U.N.C.H. Collaborative.

J Appalach Health. 2020-1-26

[10]
The effectiveness of telephone and internet-based supportive care for patients with esophageal cancer on enhanced recovery after surgery in China: A randomized controlled trial.

Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022-3-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索