Popov Alexander, Henze Günter, Roumiantseva Julia, Bydanov Oleh, Belevtsev Mikhail, Verzhbitskaya Tatiana, Movchan Liudmila, Tsaur Grigory, Lagoyko Svetlana, Zharikova Liudmila, Myakova Natalia, Litvinov Dmitry, Khlebnikova Olga, Streneva Olga, Stolyarova Elena, Ponomareva Natalia, Novichkova Galina, Fechina Larisa, Aleinikova Olga, Karachunskiy Alexander
Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, 1, S. Mashela St., Moscow 117998, Russia.
Department of Pediatric Oncology Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 23;15(23):5547. doi: 10.3390/cancers15235547.
UNLABELLED: This report presents the results of the assessment of MRD response by multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) with regard to the randomized use of pegylated asparaginase (PEG). In this study, PEG was randomly administered at a dose of 1000 U/m on day 3 of induction therapy in children with B-lineage ALL. METHODS: Conventional induction therapy consisted of dexamethasone, vincristine, and daunorubicin. MRD data was available in 502 patients who were randomized at the start of induction therapy, standard-risk (SR) patients into three (conventional induction without PEG, induction with additional PEG and with PEG but without daunorubicin) and intermediate-risk (ImR) patients into two groups (with additional PEG and without PEG). RESULTS: The single administration of PEG resulted in a significantly higher proportion of rapid responders, in SR patients even when no anthracyclines were used for induction. In the SR group, the event-free survival of the MFC-MRD fast responders was similar in the PEG- and PEG+ arms (92.0 ± 3.1% vs. 96.2 ± 1.5%, respectively), and the same unfavorable trend was observed for MFC-MRD slow responders (57.5 ± 12.3% vs. 66.7 ± 15.7%, respectively). Results were similar in ImR patients: (94.3 ± 3.2% vs. 95.1 ± 2.4%, for fast responders and 63.3 ± 7.6% vs. 78.1 ± 7.9%, for slow responders in PEG- and PEG+ arms, respectively). However, there is a large difference between the proportion of MFC-MRD slow responders in the PEG- and PEG+ groups (18.3% vs. 5.2% for the SR group and 44.2% vs. 25.0% for the ImR group). CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, early use of PEG-ASP not only leads to an accelerated reduction of blasts, but also to an excellent outcome in a significantly larger proportion of patients in both risk groups.
未标注:本报告展示了关于聚乙二醇化天冬酰胺酶(PEG)随机使用情况的多色流式细胞术(MFC)评估微小残留病(MRD)反应的结果。在本研究中,PEG在B系急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)儿童诱导治疗的第3天以1000 U/m²的剂量随机给药。 方法:传统诱导治疗包括地塞米松、长春新碱和柔红霉素。502例在诱导治疗开始时随机分组的患者可获得MRD数据,标准风险(SR)患者分为三组(无PEG的传统诱导治疗组、额外使用PEG的诱导治疗组和使用PEG但不使用柔红霉素的诱导治疗组),中危(ImR)患者分为两组(额外使用PEG组和不使用PEG组)。 结果:单次使用PEG导致快速反应者比例显著更高,在SR患者中,即使诱导治疗不使用蒽环类药物也是如此。在SR组中,MFC-MRD快速反应者的无事件生存率在PEG组和PEG+组中相似(分别为92.0±3.1%和96.2±1.5%),MFC-MRD缓慢反应者也观察到相同的不利趋势(分别为57.5±12.3%和66.7±15.7%)。ImR患者的结果相似:PEG组和PEG+组中快速反应者分别为94.3±3.2%和95.1±2.4%,缓慢反应者分别为63.3±7.6%和78.1±7.9%。然而,PEG组和PEG+组中MFC-MRD缓慢反应者的比例存在很大差异(SR组为18.3%对5.2%,ImR组为44.2%对25.0%)。 结论:因此,早期使用PEG-ASP不仅能加速原始细胞的减少,而且在两个风险组中,能使显著更多比例的患者获得良好结局。
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2021-6
J Clin Med. 2021-4-29