Suppr超能文献

对初始免疫治疗有持久临床获益的晚期非小细胞肺癌的纵向研究:疾病进展后抗PD-1/PD-L1治疗持续应用的策略

Longitudinal Study of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Initial Durable Clinical Benefit to Immunotherapy: Strategies for Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Continuation beyond Progression.

作者信息

Pourmir Ivan, Elaidi Reza, Maaradji Zineb, De Saint Basile Hortense, Ung Monivann, Ismaili Mohammed, Fournier Laure, Rance Bastien, Gibault Laure, Ben Dhiab Rym, Gazeau Benoit, Fabre Elizabeth

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, CARPEM, Paris Cité University, 20 Rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.

INSERM U970, Université Paris-Cité, 56 Rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 26;15(23):5587. doi: 10.3390/cancers15235587.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A better understanding of resistance to checkpoint inhibitors is essential to define subsequent treatments in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. By characterizing clinical and radiological features of progression after anti-programmed death-1/programmed death ligand-1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1), we aimed to define therapeutic strategies in patients with initial durable clinical benefit.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This monocentric, retrospective study included patients who presented progressive disease (PD) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria after anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Patients were classified into two groups, "primary resistance" and "Progressive Disease (PD) after Durable Clinical Benefit (DCB)", according to the Society of Immunotherapy of Cancer classification. We compared the post-progression survival (PPS) of both groups and analyzed the patterns of progression. An exploratory analysis was performed using the tumor growth rate (TGR) to assess the global growth kinetics of cancer and the persistent benefit of immunotherapy beyond PD after DCB.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients were included; 105 of them presented "primary resistance" and 43 "PD after DCB". The median PPS was 5.2 months (95% CI: 2.6-6.5) for primary resistance ( < 0.0001) vs. 21.3 months (95% CI: 18.5-36.3) for "PD after DCB", and the multivariable hazard ratio was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.07-0.30). The oligoprogression pattern was frequent in the "PD after DCB" group (76.7%) and occurred mostly in pre-existing lesions (72.1%). TGR deceleration suggested a persistent benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in 44.2% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

PD after DCB is an independent factor of longer post-progression survival with specific patterns that prompt to contemplate loco-regional treatments. TGR is a promising tool to assess the residual benefit of immunotherapy and justify the continuation of immunotherapy in addition to radiotherapy or surgery.

摘要

背景与目的

深入了解对检查点抑制剂的耐药性对于确定晚期非小细胞肺癌的后续治疗至关重要。通过对接受抗程序性死亡蛋白1/程序性死亡配体1(抗PD-1/PD-L1)治疗后疾病进展的临床和放射学特征进行表征,我们旨在确定初始获得持久临床获益患者的治疗策略。

患者与方法

这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了根据RECIST 1.1标准在接受抗PD-1/PD-L1单药治疗后出现疾病进展(PD)的患者。根据癌症免疫治疗学会的分类,患者被分为两组,即“原发性耐药”组和“持久临床获益(DCB)后疾病进展(PD)”组。我们比较了两组的进展后生存期(PPS),并分析了疾病进展模式。使用肿瘤生长率(TGR)进行探索性分析,以评估癌症的整体生长动力学以及DCB后免疫治疗在PD后持续的获益情况。

结果

共纳入148例患者;其中105例表现为“原发性耐药”,43例为“DCB后PD”。原发性耐药组的中位PPS为5.2个月(95%CI:2.6 - 6.5),而“DCB后PD”组为21.3个月(95%CI:18.5 - 36.3)(P < 0.0001),多变量风险比为0.14(95%CI:0.07 - 0.30)。寡进展模式在“DCB后PD”组中较为常见(76.7%),且大多发生在原有病灶(72.1%)。44.2%的病例中TGR减速提示PD-1/PD-L1阻断具有持续获益。

结论

DCB后PD是进展后生存期较长的独立因素,具有特定模式,提示应考虑局部区域治疗。TGR是评估免疫治疗残余获益以及证明除放疗或手术外继续免疫治疗合理性的有前景的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/612f/10705796/cdc628c3fcf1/cancers-15-05587-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验