Melnick M
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1979;15(3):19-41.
We have seen that what must be applied to dysmorphology is the doctrine of multifactorial causality, ie dysmorphogenetic events have both genetic and nongenetic etiologic components to varying degrees. Complicating matters is the extent to which there is etiologic and/or mechanistic heterogeneity (Fig. 1). This is nicely illustrated by the holoprosencephaly anomaly. In addition, there are numerous CNS malformations that have major single gene, chromosomal, or environmental initiating agents of malformation mechanisms. Still a mystery is the common neural tube malformations. It is now clear that the "multifactorial/threshold" model is an inadequate explanation of the observed data and until the etiologic heterogeneity of these malformations is clearly defined, our knowledge remains primarily empiric. A potential area of fruitful investigation is likely to be the identification of maternal genotypes which do not allow detoxification of potential environmental teratogens.
我们已经看到,必须将多因素因果关系学说应用于畸形学,即畸形发生事件在不同程度上具有遗传和非遗传病因成分。使情况复杂化的是病因和/或机制异质性的程度(图1)。全前脑畸形就很好地说明了这一点。此外,有许多中枢神经系统畸形具有主要的单基因、染色体或环境致畸机制起始因素。常见的神经管畸形仍然是个谜。现在很清楚,“多因素/阈值”模型不足以解释所观察到的数据,在这些畸形的病因异质性得到明确定义之前,我们的知识主要仍基于经验。一个可能富有成果的研究领域可能是识别那些无法对潜在环境致畸物进行解毒的母体基因型。