Department of Dietetics, Nutrition and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia.
Eat Weight Disord. 2023 Dec 9;28(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s40519-023-01631-7.
Orthorexia nervosa involves restricting diet based on quality rather than quantity. Although orthorexia is well reported in many at-risk populations, limited data addresses its presence in individuals with eating disorder history (EDs) or athletes. We aimed to identify the presence and potential drivers of orthorexia in adults with EDs and endurance athletes, compared to control subjects.
Participants ≥ 18y included: people with a diagnosed eating disorder (ED as per DSM-5); endurance athletes (training/competing ≥ 5 h/week); or control subjects. Participants (n = 197) completed an online survey assessing orthorexia (eating habits questionnaire, EHQ), eating motivations (TEMS-B) and compulsive exercise (CET).
ED had the highest orthorexia symptom severity (92.0 ± 3.02, n = 32), followed by athletes (76.2 ± 2.74, n = 54) and controls (71.0 ± 1.80, n = 111) (F (2) = 18.2, p < 0.001). A strong positive correlation existed between weight control motives and higher orthorexia symptom severity (r = 0.54, 95% CI [1.35, 2.36], p < 0.001), while a weak negative association existed between Hunger and Pleasure motives and higher orthorexia symptom severity (r = 0.23, 95% CI [- 2.24, - 0.34], p = 0.008; r = 0.26, 95% CI [- 2.11, - 0.47], p = 0.002, respectively). A moderate positive relationship was found between CET and orthorexia symptom severity (95% CI [1.52, 3.12], p < 0.001).
Adults with ED history and endurance athletes have greater orthorexia symptom severity compared to control. Clinicians working with at-risk populations should screen patients and be aware of red-flags of orthorexic traits, desire to control weight, and compulsive exercise behavior.
III: Evidence obtained from cohort studies.
矫枉过正涉及根据质量而不是数量来限制饮食。尽管矫枉过正已在许多高危人群中得到很好的报道,但关于有饮食障碍史(ED)或运动员的个体中存在矫枉过正的数据有限。我们旨在确定与对照组相比,有 ED 史的成年人和耐力运动员中矫枉过正的存在和潜在驱动因素。
参与者年龄≥ 18 岁,包括:经 DSM-5 诊断的饮食障碍患者(ED);每周训练/比赛≥ 5 小时的耐力运动员;或对照组。参与者(n = 197)完成了一项在线调查,评估了矫枉过正(饮食习惯问卷,EHQ)、饮食动机(TEMS-B)和强迫性运动(CET)。
ED 的矫枉过正症状严重程度最高(92.0 ± 3.02,n = 32),其次是运动员(76.2 ± 2.74,n = 54)和对照组(71.0 ± 1.80,n = 111)(F(2)= 18.2,p < 0.001)。体重控制动机与较高的矫枉过正症状严重程度呈强正相关(r = 0.54,95%CI [1.35,2.36],p < 0.001),而饥饿和愉悦动机与较高的矫枉过正症状严重程度呈弱负相关(r = 0.23,95%CI [-2.24,-0.34],p = 0.008;r = 0.26,95%CI [-2.11,-0.47],p = 0.002)。CET 与矫枉过正症状严重程度呈中度正相关(95%CI [1.52,3.12],p < 0.001)。
有 ED 史和耐力运动员的成年人比对照组有更严重的矫枉过正症状。与高危人群合作的临床医生应筛查患者,并注意矫枉过正特征、控制体重的欲望和强迫性运动行为的危险信号。
III:队列研究获得的证据。