Instituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco Semiárido, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Chañar Pozo S/N, Leales 4113, Tucumán, Argentina; Geography Department, Humboldt-University Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany; Instituto de Ecología Regional, CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Casilla de Correo 34, 4107 Yerba Buena, Tucumán, Argentina.
Instituto de Ecología Regional, CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Casilla de Correo 34, 4107 Yerba Buena, Tucumán, Argentina.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:168973. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168973. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
Tropical dry woodlands and savannas harbour high levels of biodiversity and carbon, but are also important regions for agricultural production. This generates trade-offs between agriculture and the environment, as agricultural expansion and intensification typically involve the removal of natural woody vegetation. Cattle ranching is an expanding land use in many of these regions, but how different forms of ranching mediate the production/environment trade-off remains weakly understood. Here, we focus on the Argentine Chaco, to evaluate trade-offs between beef production and carbon storage in grazing systems with different levels of woody cover (n = 27). We measured beef productivity and carbon storage during 2018/19 and used a regression framework to quantify the trade-off between both, and to analyze which agroclimatic and management variables explain the observed trade-off. Our main finding was that silvopastures had the lowest trade-off between beef production and carbon storage, as management in these systems seeks to increase herbaceous forage by removing shrubs, while maintaining most of the bigger trees that contain most above-ground carbon. The most important variable explaining the beef production/carbon storage trade-off was pasture management, specifically the number of shrub encroachment control interventions, with a lower trade-off for higher numbers of interventions. Unfortunately, more interventions can also result in woody cover degradation over time, and shrub encroachment management must therefore be improved to become sustainable. Overall, our study highlights the strong environmental trade-offs associated with beef production in dry woodlands and savanna, but also the key role of good management practices in lowering this trade-off. Specifically, silvopastoral systems can increase beef production as much as converting woodlands to tree-less pastures, but silvopastures retain much more carbon in aboveground vegetation. Silvopastoral systems thus represent a promising land-use option to lower production/environment trade-offs in the Dry Chaco and likely many other tropical dry woodlands and savannas.
热带干旱林和稀树草原具有较高的生物多样性和碳储量,但也是农业生产的重要区域。这就产生了农业和环境之间的权衡,因为农业的扩张和集约化通常涉及到天然木本植被的移除。在这些地区的许多地方,养牛业是一种不断扩张的土地利用方式,但不同形式的牧场如何调节生产/环境的权衡关系仍知之甚少。在这里,我们以阿根廷查科地区为重点,评估了不同木本覆盖程度(n=27)的放牧系统中牛肉生产和碳储存之间的权衡关系。我们在 2018/19 年期间测量了牛肉的生产力和碳储存,并使用回归框架来量化两者之间的权衡关系,并分析哪些农业气候和管理变量解释了观察到的权衡关系。我们的主要发现是,林牧系统的牛肉生产和碳储存之间的权衡关系最小,因为这些系统的管理通过清除灌木来增加草本饲料,同时保留了含有大部分地上碳的大多数大树。解释牛肉生产/碳储存权衡关系的最重要变量是牧场管理,特别是灌木侵入控制干预的次数,干预次数越多,权衡关系越低。不幸的是,随着时间的推移,更多的干预措施也可能导致木本覆盖退化,因此必须改进灌木侵入管理,使其可持续发展。总体而言,我们的研究强调了在干旱林和稀树草原中与牛肉生产相关的强烈环境权衡关系,但也强调了良好管理实践在降低这种权衡关系方面的关键作用。具体来说,林牧系统可以像将林地转化为无树牧场一样增加牛肉产量,但林牧系统保留了更多的地上植被碳。因此,林牧系统是降低干燥查科和可能许多其他热带干旱林和稀树草原地区生产/环境权衡关系的一种很有前途的土地利用选择。